From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@meta.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
"viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"paul@paul-moore.com" <paul@paul-moore.com>,
"jmorris@namei.org" <jmorris@namei.org>,
"serge@hallyn.com" <serge@hallyn.com>,
"jack@suse.cz" <jack@suse.cz>,
"john.johansen@canonical.com" <john.johansen@canonical.com>,
"stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com" <stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com>,
"omosnace@redhat.com" <omosnace@redhat.com>,
"mic@digikod.net" <mic@digikod.net>,
"gnoack@google.com" <gnoack@google.com>,
"takedakn@nttdata.co.jp" <takedakn@nttdata.co.jp>,
"herton@canonical.com" <herton@canonical.com>,
Kernel Team <kernel-team@meta.com>,
"selinux@vger.kernel.org" <selinux@vger.kernel.org>,
"apparmor@lists.ubuntu.com" <apparmor@lists.ubuntu.com>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] tomoyo: Convert from sb_mount to granular mount hooks
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 18:58:15 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6c298238-8d87-4c41-84a7-e0373d466a15@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPhsuW4G7vo-JZqenZ-sFHw9z02wZUJa1-+9U81U--vQhnfG_Q@mail.gmail.com>
On 2026/03/24 16:46, Song Liu wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 11:12 PM Tetsuo Handa
> <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> wrote:
>>
>> On 2026/03/24 4:31, Song Liu wrote:
>>>> Then, how can LSM modules know that how the requested filesystem resolves
>>>> the dev_name argument, without embedding filesystem specific resolution
>>>> logic into individual LSM module?
>>>
>>> IIUC, if an LSM cares about the dev_name of a new mount, it will have to look
>>> into each individual filesystem. We can add a LSM hook for the filesystems to
>>> call. But this will require changes to individual filesystem code. OTOH,
>>> dev_name can probably bridge the gap as we change filesystems.
>>>
>>> Would this work?
>>
>> I guess something like untested diff shown below would work.
>
> I think this doesn't work with erofs on file (requires
> CONFIG_EROFS_FS_BACKED_BY_FILE). erofs may not be the
> only one that has this problem.
This is incomplete but I think this is better than now because currently
mount() operation likely fails with -ENOENT if the requested filesystem
does not interpret fc->source as a pathname despite tomoyo_mount_acl()
always interprets fc->source as a pathname when FS_REQUIRES_DEV is set.
Also, mount() operation might by error succeed because tomoyo_mount_acl()
checks permission against unintended file when e.g. "mtd0" by chance exists
in the current directory.
We could add filesystem-specific logic to e.g. CONFIG_EROFS_FS_BACKED_BY_FILE
case that copies the resolved "struct path" to fc->source_path. But even without
adding filesystem-specific logic, mount() operation will succeed because
tomoyo_mount_acl() can handle fc->source as a string rather than a canonicalized
pathname.
Being able to know whether tomoyo_mount_acl() should interpret dev_name as a
pathname (which is subjected to canonicalization, and also subjected to more
complicated permission checks based on e.g. inode's uid/gid) is appreciated.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-24 9:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-18 18:43 [PATCH 0/7] lsm: Replace security_sb_mount with granular mount hooks Song Liu
2026-03-18 18:43 ` [PATCH 1/7] lsm: Add granular mount hooks to replace security_sb_mount Song Liu
2026-03-18 18:43 ` [PATCH 2/7] apparmor: Remove redundant MS_MGC_MSK stripping in apparmor_sb_mount Song Liu
2026-03-18 18:43 ` [PATCH 3/7] apparmor: Convert from sb_mount to granular mount hooks Song Liu
2026-03-18 18:43 ` [PATCH 4/7] selinux: " Song Liu
2026-03-18 18:43 ` [PATCH 5/7] landlock: " Song Liu
2026-03-18 18:43 ` [PATCH 6/7] tomoyo: " Song Liu
2026-03-21 12:54 ` Tetsuo Handa
2026-03-22 1:06 ` Song Liu
2026-03-22 10:46 ` Tetsuo Handa
2026-03-23 3:32 ` Song Liu
2026-03-23 10:16 ` Christian Brauner
2026-03-23 10:32 ` Tetsuo Handa
2026-03-23 19:31 ` Song Liu
2026-03-24 6:12 ` Tetsuo Handa
2026-03-24 7:46 ` Song Liu
2026-03-24 9:58 ` Tetsuo Handa [this message]
2026-03-24 19:03 ` Song Liu
2026-03-25 1:01 ` Tetsuo Handa
2026-03-25 1:35 ` Song Liu
2026-03-18 18:44 ` [PATCH 7/7] lsm: Remove security_sb_mount and security_move_mount Song Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6c298238-8d87-4c41-84a7-e0373d466a15@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--to=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=apparmor@lists.ubuntu.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=gnoack@google.com \
--cc=herton@canonical.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=omosnace@redhat.com \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=songliubraving@meta.com \
--cc=stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com \
--cc=takedakn@nttdata.co.jp \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox