From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Howells Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/43] FS-Cache: Recruit a couple of page flags for cache management [ver #46] Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 18:09:15 +0100 Message-ID: <7249.1238692155@redhat.com> References: <200904030353.17713.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> <200904030225.16372.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> <6362.1238687462@redhat.com> <200904030315.03606.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, nfsv4@linux-nfs.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Nick Piggin Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200904030353.17713.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nfsv4-bounces@linux-nfs.org Errors-To: nfsv4-bounces@linux-nfs.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Nick Piggin wrote: > Comments about PG_private still stand. Replies about PG_private still stand. It's owned by fs/buffer.c, and if the 'netfs' uses that, then PG_private is not available. Though, as I said, fs/buffer.c could be broken of its control of the bit. David