From: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, kbusch@kernel.org, sagi@grimberg.me,
jejb@linux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
djwong@kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, brauner@kernel.org,
dchinner@redhat.com, jack@suse.cz, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
tytso@mit.edu, jbongio@google.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
ming.lei@redhat.com, ojaswin@linux.ibm.com, bvanassche@acm.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/15] block: Limit atomic write IO size according to atomic_write_max_sectors
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 08:15:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <749e8de5-8bbb-4fb5-a0c0-82937a9dfa38@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240213062620.GD23128@lst.de>
On 13/02/2024 06:26, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 11:38:33AM +0000, John Garry wrote:
>> Currently an IO size is limited to the request_queue limits max_sectors.
>> Limit the size for an atomic write to queue limit atomic_write_max_sectors
>> value.
>
> Same here. Please have one patch that actually adds useful atomic write
> support to the block layer. That doesn't include fs stuff like
> IOCB_ATOMIC or the block file operation support, but to have a reviewable
> chunk I'd really like to see the full block-layer support for the limits,
> enforcing them, the merge prevention in a single commit with an extensive
> commit log explaining the semantics. That allows a useful review without
> looking at the full tree, and also will help with people reading history
> in the future.
Fine, so essentially merge 1, 2, 5, 7, 8, 9
BTW, I was also going to add this function which ensures that partitions
are properly aligned:
bool bdev_can_atomic_write(struct block_device *bdev)
{
struct request_queue *bd_queue = bdev->bd_queue;
struct queue_limits *limits = &bd_queue->limits;
if(!limits->atomic_write_unit_min_sectors)
return false;
if (bdev_is_partition(bdev)) {
unsigned int granularity = max(limits->atomic_write_unit_min_sectors,
limits->atomic_write_hw_boundary_sectors);
if (bdev->bd_start_sect % granularity)
return false;
}
return true;
}
I'm note sure if that would be better in the fops.c patch (or not added)
Thanks,
John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-13 8:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-24 11:38 [PATCH v3 00/15] block atomic writes John Garry
2024-01-24 11:38 ` [PATCH v3 01/15] block: Add atomic write operations to request_queue limits John Garry
2024-02-13 6:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-24 11:38 ` [PATCH v3 02/15] block: Limit atomic writes according to bio and queue limits John Garry
2024-02-13 4:33 ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-02-13 8:05 ` John Garry
2024-01-24 11:38 ` [PATCH v3 03/15] fs/bdev: Add atomic write support info to statx John Garry
2024-01-24 11:38 ` [PATCH v3 04/15] fs: Add RWF_ATOMIC and IOCB_ATOMIC flags for atomic write support John Garry
2024-01-24 11:38 ` [PATCH v3 05/15] block: Add REQ_ATOMIC flag John Garry
2024-02-13 6:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-24 11:38 ` [PATCH v3 06/15] block: Pass blk_queue_get_max_sectors() a request pointer John Garry
2024-02-13 6:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-13 8:15 ` John Garry
2024-01-24 11:38 ` [PATCH v3 07/15] block: Limit atomic write IO size according to atomic_write_max_sectors John Garry
2024-02-13 6:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-13 8:15 ` John Garry [this message]
2024-02-14 7:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-14 9:24 ` John Garry
2024-01-24 11:38 ` [PATCH v3 08/15] block: Error an attempt to split an atomic write bio John Garry
2024-01-24 11:38 ` [PATCH v3 09/15] block: Add checks to merging of atomic writes John Garry
2024-02-12 10:54 ` Nilay Shroff
2024-02-12 11:20 ` [PATCH " John Garry
2024-02-12 12:01 ` Nilay Shroff
2024-02-12 12:09 ` John Garry
2024-02-13 6:52 ` Nilay Shroff
2024-01-24 11:38 ` [PATCH v3 10/15] block: Add fops atomic write support John Garry
2024-02-13 9:36 ` Nilay Shroff
2024-02-13 9:58 ` [PATCH " John Garry
2024-02-13 11:08 ` Nilay Shroff
2024-02-13 11:52 ` John Garry
2024-02-14 9:38 ` Nilay Shroff
2024-02-14 11:29 ` John Garry
2024-02-14 11:47 ` Nilay Shroff
2024-01-24 11:38 ` [PATCH v3 11/15] scsi: sd: Support reading atomic write properties from block limits VPD John Garry
2024-02-13 6:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-13 8:16 ` John Garry
2024-01-24 11:38 ` [PATCH v3 12/15] scsi: sd: Add WRITE_ATOMIC_16 support John Garry
2024-01-24 11:38 ` [PATCH v3 13/15] scsi: scsi_debug: Atomic write support John Garry
2024-01-24 11:38 ` [PATCH v3 14/15] nvme: Support atomic writes John Garry
2024-02-13 6:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-13 14:21 ` John Garry
2024-02-14 8:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-14 9:21 ` John Garry
2024-02-14 12:27 ` Nilay Shroff
2024-02-14 13:02 ` John Garry
2024-02-14 16:45 ` Nilay Shroff
2024-01-24 11:38 ` [PATCH v3 15/15] nvme: Ensure atomic writes will be executed atomically John Garry
2024-01-25 0:52 ` Keith Busch
2024-01-25 11:28 ` John Garry
2024-01-29 6:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-29 9:36 ` John Garry
2024-01-29 14:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-26 3:50 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2024-02-13 6:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-13 14:07 ` John Garry
2024-01-29 6:18 ` [PATCH v3 00/15] block atomic writes Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-29 9:17 ` John Garry
2024-02-06 18:44 ` John Garry
2024-02-10 12:12 ` David Laight
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=749e8de5-8bbb-4fb5-a0c0-82937a9dfa38@oracle.com \
--to=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jbongio@google.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).