From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/19] BLOCK: Permit block layer to be disabled [try #5]
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 19:28:28 +0100
Message-ID: <750.1156876108@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com>
References: <20060829175421.GS12257@kernel.dk>  <20060829164549.15723.15017.stgit@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:30600 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964986AbWH2S2c (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 29 Aug 2006 14:28:32 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20060829175421.GS12257@kernel.dk> 
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:

> Any remaining changes? Looks fine to me, although I wonder why you did
> not kill the block_sync_page() completely in AFS. Christophs analysis
> looked correct to me.

Try #6 which I've just posted should do the trick.

David