linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J. R. Okajima" <hooanon05@yahoo.co.jp>
To: Phillip Lougher <phillip@lougher.demon.co.uk>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Q. cache in squashfs?
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 14:07:54 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7545.1278738474@jrobl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C370017.4070604@lougher.demon.co.uk>


Phillip Lougher:
> You can determine which blocks are being repeatedly decompressed by
> printing out the value of cache->name in squashfs_cache_get().
>
> You should get one of "data", "fragment" and "metadata" for data
> blocks, fragment blocks and metadata respectively.
>
> This information will go a long way in showing where the problem lies.

Here is a patch to count and the result.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
frag(3, 100) x -no-fragments(with, without)

O: no-fragments x inner ext3

A: frag=3 x without -no-fragments
B: frag=3 x with -no-fragments

C: frag=100 x without -no-fragments
-: frag=100 x with -no-fragments

	cat10		cache_get		read		zlib
	(sec,cpu)	(meta,frag,data)	(meta,data)	(meta,data)
	----------------------------------------------------------------------
O	.06, 35%	92, -, 41		3, 44		2, 3557
A	.09, 113%	12359, 81, 22		4, 90		6, 6474
B	.07, 104%	12369, -, 109		3, 100		5, 3484
C	.06, 112%	12381, 80, 35		4, 53		6, 3650

- the case O is b.img in my first mail, and the case A is a.img.
- the "cat10" column is the result of time command as described in my
  first mail.
- all these numbers just show the trend and the small difference doesn't
  have much meaning.
- with -no-fragments option (case B),
  + the number of zlib call is reduced.
  + the CPU usage is not reduced much.
  + the number of cache_get for data increses.
  + the number of read for data may increse too.
- even with the compressed fragments, by increasing
  CONFIG_SQUASHFS_FRAGMENT_CACHE_SIZE it shows similar performance (case
  C),
  + the number of zlib call is reduced.
  + the CPU usage is not reduced much.
  + the number of cache_get for data may increse.
  + the number of read for data may decrese.

I am not sure the differece of cache_get/read for data between cases is
so meaningful.
But it surely shows high CPU usage in squashfs and I guess it is caused
by cache_get for metadata. The number of zlib compression may not be
related to this CPU usage much.


J. R. Okajima




  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-10  5:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-24  2:37 Q. cache in squashfs? J. R. Okajima
2010-07-08  3:57 ` Phillip Lougher
2010-07-08  6:08   ` J. R. Okajima
2010-07-09  7:53     ` J. R. Okajima
2010-07-09 10:32       ` Phillip Lougher
2010-07-09 10:55         ` Phillip Lougher
2010-07-10  5:07           ` J. R. Okajima [this message]
2010-07-10  5:08             ` J. R. Okajima
2010-07-11  2:48             ` Phillip Lougher
2010-07-11  5:55               ` J. R. Okajima
2010-07-11  9:38                 ` [RFC 0/2] squashfs parallel decompression J. R. Okajima
2011-02-22 19:41                   ` Phillip Susi
2011-02-23  3:23                     ` Phillip Lougher
2010-07-11  9:38                 ` [RFC 1/2] squashfs parallel decompression, early wait_on_buffer J. R. Okajima
2010-07-11  9:38                 ` [RFC 2/2] squashfs parallel decompression, z_stream per cpu J. R. Okajima
2010-07-09 12:24         ` Q. cache in squashfs? J. R. Okajima

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7545.1278738474@jrobl \
    --to=hooanon05@yahoo.co.jp \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=phillip@lougher.demon.co.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).