From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: What should dcache routines should be called at the end of mkdir?
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 22:00:01 +0100
Message-ID: <7626.1176930001@redhat.com>
References: <4432.1176914169@redhat.com>
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:42125 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S2992617AbXDRVAR (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 18 Apr 2007 17:00:17 -0400
In-Reply-To: <4432.1176914169@redhat.com> 
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote:

> In this case, afs_lookup() is called extraneously...  But it does seem to
> work.

It does help, of course, if I hash the negative dentry in afs_lookup() in
addition to d_instantiate()'ing it.  In fact, d_add() is what I should've been
doing.  Now it works.

David