linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
To: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>, Bill O'Donnell <bodonnel@redhat.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zonefs: convert zonefs to use the new mount api
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 10:13:02 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7cf58fb0-b13c-473c-b31c-864f0cac3754@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3252c311-8f8f-4e73-8e4a-92bc6daebc7b@themaw.net>

On 2/11/24 12:36, Ian Kent wrote:
>>> +static void zonefs_free_fc(struct fs_context *fc)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct zonefs_context *ctx = fc->fs_private;
>> I do not think you need this variable.
> 
> That's a fair comment but it says fs_private contains the fs context
> 
> for the casual reader.
> 
>>
>>> +
>>> +	kfree(ctx);
>> Is it safe to not set fc->fs_private to NULL ?
> 
> I think it's been safe to call kfree() with a NULL argument for ages.

That I know, which is why I asked if *not* setting fc->fs_private to NULL after
the kfree is safe. Because if another call to kfree for that pointer is done, we
will endup with a double free oops. But as long as the mount API guarantees that
it will not happen, then OK.

> 
> 
> This could be done but so far the convention with mount api code
> 
> appears to have been to add the local variable which I thought was for
> descriptive purposes but it could just be the result of cut and pastes.

Keeping the variable is fine. After all, that is not the fast path :)


-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research


  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-12  1:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-09  0:08 [PATCH] zonefs: convert zonefs to use the new mount api Bill O'Donnell
2024-02-09  2:10 ` Damien Le Moal
2024-02-09 16:55   ` Bill O'Donnell
2024-02-11  2:01     ` Ian Kent
2024-02-11  3:36   ` Ian Kent
2024-02-12  1:13     ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2024-02-12 12:12       ` Ian Kent
2024-02-13 23:31         ` Ian Kent
2024-02-13 23:37           ` Bill O'Donnell
2024-02-14  0:16             ` Damien Le Moal
2024-02-14 11:15             ` Damien Le Moal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7cf58fb0-b13c-473c-b31c-864f0cac3754@kernel.org \
    --to=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=bodonnel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=raven@themaw.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).