linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 32/46] kernel: optimise seqlock
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 20:45:02 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7d7ee49eddbd08e5d19a71560dda2a3dc22a4735.1290852959.git.npiggin@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1290852958.git.npiggin@kernel.dk>

Add branch annotations for seqlock read fastpath, and introduce
__read_seqcount_begin and __read_seqcount_end functions, that can avoid the
smp_rmb() if used carefully. These will be used by store-free path walking
algorithm performance is critical and seqlocks are in use.

Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
---
 include/linux/seqlock.h |   67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/seqlock.h b/include/linux/seqlock.h
index 632205c..513c550 100644
--- a/include/linux/seqlock.h
+++ b/include/linux/seqlock.h
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static __always_inline int read_seqretry(const seqlock_t *sl, unsigned start)
 {
 	smp_rmb();
 
-	return (sl->sequence != start);
+	return unlikely(sl->sequence != start);
 }
 
 
@@ -125,14 +125,25 @@ typedef struct seqcount {
 #define SEQCNT_ZERO { 0 }
 #define seqcount_init(x)	do { *(x) = (seqcount_t) SEQCNT_ZERO; } while (0)
 
-/* Start of read using pointer to a sequence counter only.  */
-static inline unsigned read_seqcount_begin(const seqcount_t *s)
+/**
+ * __read_seqcount_begin - begin a seq-read critical section (without barrier)
+ * @s: pointer to seqcount_t
+ * Returns: count to be passed to read_seqcount_retry
+ *
+ * __read_seqcount_begin is like read_seqcount_begin, but has no smp_rmb()
+ * barrier. Callers should ensure that smp_rmb() or equivalent ordering is
+ * provided before actually loading any of the variables that are to be
+ * protected in this critical section.
+ *
+ * Use carefully, only in critical code, and comment how the barrier is
+ * provided.
+ */
+static inline unsigned __read_seqcount_begin(const seqcount_t *s)
 {
 	unsigned ret;
 
 repeat:
 	ret = s->sequence;
-	smp_rmb();
 	if (unlikely(ret & 1)) {
 		cpu_relax();
 		goto repeat;
@@ -140,14 +151,56 @@ repeat:
 	return ret;
 }
 
-/*
- * Test if reader processed invalid data because sequence number has changed.
+/**
+ * read_seqcount_begin - begin a seq-read critical section
+ * @s: pointer to seqcount_t
+ * Returns: count to be passed to read_seqcount_retry
+ *
+ * read_seqcount_begin opens a read critical section of the given seqcount.
+ * Validity of the critical section is tested by checking read_seqcount_retry
+ * function.
+ */
+static inline unsigned read_seqcount_begin(const seqcount_t *s)
+{
+	unsigned ret = __read_seqcount_begin(s);
+	smp_rmb();
+	return ret;
+}
+
+/**
+ * __read_seqcount_retry - end a seq-read critical section (without barrier)
+ * @s: pointer to seqcount_t
+ * @start: count, from read_seqcount_begin
+ * Returns: 1 if retry is required, else 0
+ *
+ * __read_seqcount_retry is like read_seqcount_retry, but has no smp_rmb()
+ * barrier. Callers should ensure that smp_rmb() or equivalent ordering is
+ * provided before actually loading any of the variables that are to be
+ * protected in this critical section.
+ *
+ * Use carefully, only in critical code, and comment how the barrier is
+ * provided.
+ */
+static inline int __read_seqcount_retry(const seqcount_t *s, unsigned start)
+{
+	return unlikely(s->sequence != start);
+}
+
+/**
+ * read_seqcount_retry - end a seq-read critical section
+ * @s: pointer to seqcount_t
+ * @start: count, from read_seqcount_begin
+ * Returns: 1 if retry is required, else 0
+ *
+ * read_seqcount_retry closes a read critical section of the given seqcount.
+ * If the critical section was invalid, it must be ignored (and typically
+ * retried).
  */
 static inline int read_seqcount_retry(const seqcount_t *s, unsigned start)
 {
 	smp_rmb();
 
-	return s->sequence != start;
+	return __read_seqcount_retry(s, start);
 }
 
 
-- 
1.7.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-11-27 10:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 96+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-27 10:15 [PATCH 00/46] rcu-walk and dcache scaling Nick Piggin
2010-11-27  9:44 ` [PATCH 02/46] fs: d_validate fixes Nick Piggin
2010-12-08  1:53   ` Dave Chinner
2010-12-08  6:59     ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-09  0:50       ` Dave Chinner
2010-12-09  4:50         ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-27  9:44 ` [PATCH 03/46] kernel: kmem_ptr_validate considered harmful Nick Piggin
2010-11-27  9:44 ` [PATCH 04/46] fs: dcache documentation cleanup Nick Piggin
2010-11-27  9:44 ` [PATCH 05/46] fs: change d_delete semantics Nick Piggin
2010-11-27  9:44 ` [PATCH 06/46] cifs: dont overwrite dentry name in d_revalidate Nick Piggin
2010-11-27  9:44 ` [PATCH 07/46] jfs: " Nick Piggin
2010-11-27  9:44 ` [PATCH 08/46] fs: change d_compare for rcu-walk Nick Piggin
2010-11-27  9:44 ` [PATCH 09/46] fs: change d_hash " Nick Piggin
2010-11-27  9:44 ` [PATCH 10/46] hostfs: simplify locking Nick Piggin
2010-11-27  9:44 ` [PATCH 11/46] fs: dcache scale hash Nick Piggin
2010-12-09  6:09   ` Dave Chinner
2010-12-09  6:28     ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-09  8:17       ` Dave Chinner
2010-12-09 12:53         ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-09 23:42           ` Dave Chinner
2010-12-10  2:35             ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-10  9:01               ` Dave Chinner
2010-12-13  4:48                 ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-13  5:05                 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-27  9:44 ` [PATCH 12/46] fs: dcache scale lru Nick Piggin
2010-12-09  7:22   ` Dave Chinner
2010-12-09 12:34     ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-27  9:44 ` [PATCH 13/46] fs: dcache scale dentry refcount Nick Piggin
2010-11-27  9:44 ` [PATCH 14/46] fs: dcache scale d_unhashed Nick Piggin
2010-11-27  9:44 ` [PATCH 15/46] fs: dcache scale subdirs Nick Piggin
2010-11-27  9:44 ` [PATCH 16/46] fs: scale inode alias list Nick Piggin
2010-11-27  9:44 ` [PATCH 17/46] fs: Use rename lock and RCU for multi-step operations Nick Piggin
2011-01-18 22:32   ` Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub
2011-01-18 22:42     ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-19 22:27       ` Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub
2011-01-19 22:32         ` Nick Piggin
2011-01-25 22:10           ` Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub
2011-01-27  5:18             ` Nick Piggin
2011-02-07 18:52               ` Jim Schutt
2011-02-07 21:04                 ` Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub
2011-02-07 21:31                   ` Jim Schutt
2011-02-07 22:25                   ` Jim Schutt
2011-02-14 17:57               ` Yehuda Sadeh Weinraub
2010-11-27  9:44 ` [PATCH 18/46] fs: increase d_name lock coverage Nick Piggin
2010-11-27  9:44 ` [PATCH 19/46] fs: dcache remove dcache_lock Nick Piggin
2010-11-27  9:44 ` [PATCH 20/46] fs: dcache avoid starvation in dcache multi-step operations Nick Piggin
2010-11-27  9:44 ` [PATCH 21/46] fs: dcache reduce dput locking Nick Piggin
2010-11-27  9:44 ` [PATCH 22/46] fs: dcache reduce locking in d_alloc Nick Piggin
2010-11-27  9:44 ` [PATCH 23/46] fs: dcache reduce dcache_inode_lock Nick Piggin
2010-11-27  9:44 ` [PATCH 24/46] fs: dcache rationalise dget variants Nick Piggin
2010-11-27  9:44 ` [PATCH 25/46] fs: dcache reduce d_parent locking Nick Piggin
2010-11-27  9:44 ` [PATCH 26/46] fs: dcache reduce prune_one_dentry locking Nick Piggin
2010-11-27  9:44 ` [PATCH 27/46] fs: reduce dcache_inode_lock width in lru scanning Nick Piggin
2010-11-27  9:44 ` [PATCH 28/46] fs: use RCU in shrink_dentry_list to reduce lock nesting Nick Piggin
2010-11-27  9:44 ` [PATCH 29/46] fs: consolidate dentry kill sequence Nick Piggin
2010-11-27  9:45 ` [PATCH 30/46] fs: icache RCU free inodes Nick Piggin
2010-11-27  9:45 ` [PATCH 31/46] fs: avoid inode RCU freeing for pseudo fs Nick Piggin
2010-11-27  9:45 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2010-11-27  9:45 ` [PATCH 33/46] fs: rcu-walk for path lookup Nick Piggin
2010-11-27  9:45 ` [PATCH 34/46] fs: fs_struct use seqlock Nick Piggin
2010-11-27  9:45 ` [PATCH 35/46] fs: dcache remove d_mounted Nick Piggin
2010-11-27  9:45 ` [PATCH 36/46] fs: dcache reduce branches in lookup path Nick Piggin
2010-11-27  9:45 ` [PATCH 37/46] fs: cache optimise dentry and inode for rcu-walk Nick Piggin
2010-11-27  9:45 ` [PATCH 38/46] fs: prefetch inode data in dcache lookup Nick Piggin
2010-11-27  9:45 ` [PATCH 39/46] fs: d_revalidate_rcu for rcu-walk Nick Piggin
2010-11-27  9:45 ` [PATCH 40/46] fs: provide rcu-walk aware permission i_ops Nick Piggin
2010-11-27  9:45 ` [PATCH 41/46] fs: provide simple rcu-walk ACL implementation Nick Piggin
2010-11-27  9:45 ` [PATCH 42/46] kernel: add bl_list Nick Piggin
2010-11-27  9:45 ` [PATCH 43/46] bit_spinlock: add required includes Nick Piggin
2010-11-27  9:45 ` [PATCH 44/46] fs: dcache per-bucket dcache hash locking Nick Piggin
2010-11-27  9:45 ` [PATCH 45/46] fs: dcache per-inode inode alias locking Nick Piggin
2010-11-27  9:45 ` [PATCH 46/46] fs: improve scalability of pseudo filesystems Nick Piggin
2010-11-27  9:56 ` [PATCH 01/46] Revert "fs: use RCU read side protection in d_validate" Nick Piggin
2010-12-08  1:16   ` Dave Chinner
2010-12-08  9:38     ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-09  0:44       ` Dave Chinner
2010-12-09  4:38         ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-09  5:16           ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-27 15:04 ` [PATCH 00/46] rcu-walk and dcache scaling Anca Emanuel
2010-11-28  3:28   ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-28  6:24     ` Sedat Dilek
2010-12-01 18:03 ` David Miller
2010-12-03 16:55   ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-07 11:25 ` Dave Chinner
2010-12-07 15:24   ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-07 15:49     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-07 15:59       ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-07 16:23         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08  3:28     ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-07 21:56 ` Dave Chinner
2010-12-08  1:47   ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-08  3:32     ` Dave Chinner
2010-12-08  4:28       ` Dave Chinner
2010-12-08  7:09         ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-10 20:32           ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-12-12 14:54             ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7d7ee49eddbd08e5d19a71560dda2a3dc22a4735.1290852959.git.npiggin@kernel.dk \
    --to=npiggin@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).