From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] vfs: only add " (deleted)" where necessary Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 11:11:53 -0400 Message-ID: <8199.1280761913@localhost> References: <20100802111955.025275647@szeredi.hu> <20100802112024.851698363@szeredi.hu> <215565.1280754056@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1280761913_3871P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Miklos Szeredi Return-path: In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 02 Aug 2010 15:35:20 +0200." Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org --==_Exmh_1280761913_3871P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 15:35:20 +0200, Miklos Szeredi said: > > I'd prefer the comment about it being ambiguous remain. I'm waiting > > to see how long it takes for somebody to create a security hole by > > creating a file called '/etc/some/thing/important (deleted)' and > > having some software Do The Wrong Thing instead to > > /etc/some/thing/important. > > The same comment is left intact on top of d_path(). > > It is removed from __d_path() because this function no longer appends > "(deleted)". Oh, OK. Obviously -ENOCAFFEINE on my part, I thought you were nuking the d_path() copy. ;) --==_Exmh_1280761913_3871P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQFMVuA5cC3lWbTT17ARAurcAKDIB47qGyrKmI+5V0Cdb4Jr/EwAIwCgwmoB aqCg98YNdKyT0aZ1LeStBx0= =u+6j -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1280761913_3871P--