From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Howells Subject: Re: NFS4 mount problem Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 18:33:09 +0100 Message-ID: <8310.1113845589@redhat.com> References: <20050418171659.GE13052@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20050417135521.GA6876@infradead.org> Cc: Bryan Henderson , Christoph Hellwig , "David S. Miller" , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, steved@redhat.com Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:62647 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262139AbVDRRdz (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Apr 2005 13:33:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20050418171659.GE13052@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> To: Al Viro Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Al Viro wrote: > > Architecture-dependent blob passed to mount(2) (aka nfs4_mount_data). > If you want it to be a blob, at least have a decency to use encoding > that would not depend on alignment rules and word size. Hell, you > could use XDR - it's not that nfs would need something new to handle > it. Or, better yet, use a normal string. Mount doesn't appear to permit a big enough blob though. It has a hard limit of PAGE_SIZE. David