From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pekka Enberg Subject: Re: GFS, what's remaining Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 15:33:24 +0300 Message-ID: <84144f020509010533f5f2440@mail.gmail.com> References: <20050901104620.GA22482@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cluster@redhat.com Return-path: Received: from nproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.182.200]:20773 "EHLO nproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965094AbVIAMda convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Sep 2005 08:33:30 -0400 Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x37so122442nfc for ; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 05:33:24 -0700 (PDT) To: David Teigland In-Reply-To: <20050901104620.GA22482@redhat.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On 9/1/05, David Teigland wrote: > - Adapt the vfs so gfs (and other cfs's) don't need to walk vma lists. > [cf. ops_file.c:walk_vm(), gfs works fine as is, but some don't like it.] It works fine only if you don't care about playing well with other clustered filesystems. Pekka