From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Pekka Enberg" <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] revoke/frevoke system calls V2
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 12:51:02 +0300
Message-ID: <84144f020608070251j2e14e909v8a18f62db85ff3d4@mail.gmail.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0607271722430.4663@sbz-30.cs.Helsinki.FI>
	 <20060805122936.GC5417@ucw.cz> <20060807101745.61f21826.froese@gmx.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "Pavel Machek" <pavel@ucw.cz>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, tytso@mit.edu,
	tigran@veritas.com
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.187]:5415 "EHLO
	nf-out-0910.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750733AbWHGJvE (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 7 Aug 2006 05:51:04 -0400
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id p46so400516nfa
        for <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>; Mon, 07 Aug 2006 02:51:02 -0700 (PDT)
To: "Edgar Toernig" <froese@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <20060807101745.61f21826.froese@gmx.de>
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On 8/7/06, Edgar Toernig <froese@gmx.de> wrote:
> Why do we need [f]revoke at all?  As it doesn't implement the
> BSD semantic I can't see why it's better than fuser -k.

Which part of the BSD semantics is that?