From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Pekka Enberg" <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] LogFS proper
Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 22:15:18 +0300
Message-ID: <84144f020705081215t73f2c0fq8ecb677423329cd8@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20070507215913.GA15054@lazybastard.org>
	 <20070507220036.GB15054@lazybastard.org>
	 <1178608950.3042.273.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <20070508163226.GA22443@lazybastard.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1;
	format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Cc: "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@osdl.org>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Dave Kleikamp" <shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"David Chinner" <dgc@sgi.com>
To: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn_Engel?=" <joern@lazybastard.org>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner+glk-linux-kernel-3=40m.gmane.org-S967795AbXEHTP2@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20070508163226.GA22443@lazybastard.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On 5/8/07, J=F6rn Engel <joern@lazybastard.org> wrote:
> > > +typedef __be16 be16;
> > > +typedef __be32 be32;
> > > +typedef __be64 be64;
> >
> > Why are those typedefs necessary ?
>
> Not strictly.  I tend to use the be* types fairly often in the code a=
nd
> simply grew weary of seeing the underscores.
>
> Any objections if I seperate out the userspace headers and keep the
> shorthands for kernel code only?

Not sure what you mean but I would prefer you drop the typedefs complet=
ely.