From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Pekka Enberg" <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [patch 01/15] security: pass path to inode_create
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 14:04:17 +0300
Message-ID: <84144f020806020404v430e63c6i71cafdda616a2512@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20080529134903.615127628@szeredi.hu>
	 <E1K2uXZ-0001eE-Oi@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
	 <20080602060144.GA11564@infradead.org>
	 <E1K343a-0002dG-C9@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
	 <20080602091341.GA8011@infradead.org>
	 <E1K36PE-0002wZ-0M@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
	 <20080602093630.GA25254@infradead.org>
	 <E1K36ii-0002zj-Gn@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
	 <20080602104203.GA21898@infradead.org>
	 <E1K37hN-00039y-5o@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: hch@infradead.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org,
	sds@tycho.nsa.gov, eparis@redhat.com, casey@schaufler-ca.com,
	agruen@suse.de, jjohansen@suse.de,
	penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Miklos Szeredi" <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner+glk-linux-kernel-3=40m.gmane.org-S1759242AbYFBLEg@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <E1K37hN-00039y-5o@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 1:55 PM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> wrote:
> You can argue against the concept of apparmor itself, but you better
> argue with Crispin, because I'm quite clueless about that part.  When
> you've convinced him (and Linus (and Ubuntu, and SUSE, and Mandriva))
> that apparmor is a stupid idea, then I'll give up.  Good luck with
> that!

But then I guess you can just by-pass the VFS maintainers and send
your patches directly to Andrew/Linus. Good luck with that! :-)