public inbox for linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no
Cc: nfsv4@linux-nfs.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com
Subject: d_revalidate not being called enough on mountpoints?
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 13:50:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8505.1176727824@redhat.com> (raw)


Hi Al,

I think there might be a problem in the VFS with d_revalidate() not being
called enough on mountpoints.  As far as I can tell from the printks in my AFS
stuff, it's only called on the mounted-on dentry, and not the vfsmount-root
dentry.  However, with NFS at least (not so much AFS), can you trust that the
mount-root dentry still maps to the same inode and event if it does that that
inode is still up to date?

I discovered it because I was relying on d_revalidate() to spot that the
server had broken the callback on a directory that had been changed.  However,
the root directory of each volume isn't being d_revalidated.

In the kernel output, I see:

(1) Permission check on the root dir of /afs: volume ID 20000001, vnode ID 1:

[0ls    ] ==> afs_permission({20000001:1},1,)

(2) Revalidation of the mountpoint dir in /afs (vnode ID 6):

[0ls    ] ==> afs_d_revalidate({v={20000001:6} n=.cambridge.redhat.com fl=20},)
[0ls    ]     not promised

(3) At this point, the stats of the mounted-on dir are rechecked.

[0ls    ]     new promise [fl=20]

(4) Permission check on the root dir of /afs/.cambridge.redhat.com (volume ID
    20000003, vnode ID 1):

[0ls    ] ==> afs_permission({20000003:1},1,)

(5) Revalidation of the mountpoint dir in /afs/.cambridge.redhat.com (vnode ID
    2):

[0ls    ] ==> afs_d_revalidate({v={20000003:2} n=afsdoc fl=20},)
[0ls    ]     not promised

(6) Again, the stats of the mounted-on dir are rechecked.

[0ls    ]     new promise [fl=20]

I was expecting to see the root dentry of each vfsmount be revalidated, but
that doesn't occur.

David

             reply	other threads:[~2007-04-16 12:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-16 12:50 David Howells [this message]
2007-04-16 13:38 ` d_revalidate not being called enough on mountpoints? Trond Myklebust
2007-04-16 14:18   ` David Howells

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8505.1176727824@redhat.com \
    --to=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nfsv4@linux-nfs.org \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox