From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: OGAWA Hirofumi Subject: Re: RFC: kill msdos and vfat modules? Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 10:26:22 +0900 Message-ID: <871vq0lrgh.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> References: <20090603143200.GA5778@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: Received: from mail.parknet.ad.jp ([210.171.162.6]:51482 "EHLO mail.officemail.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752354AbZFDB0Y (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jun 2009 21:26:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090603143200.GA5778@lst.de> (Christoph Hellwig's message of "Wed, 3 Jun 2009 16:32:00 +0200") Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Christoph Hellwig writes: > There's almost no code left in the msdos and vfat modules with all > the guts in the shared fat module. Shouldn't we just do away with > the vfat and msdos modules and just provide module aliases in the > main fat module? I have no objection to it if it works. Maybe, one concern is the order of detection (rootfs, /proc/filesystems) when it's not moudle. (however, probably it's not hard to control). Thanks. -- OGAWA Hirofumi