From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,
	SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 599D7C48BE6
	for <linux-fsdevel@archiver.kernel.org>; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 08:12:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22D5761159
	for <linux-fsdevel@archiver.kernel.org>; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 08:12:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S231652AbhFPION (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 16 Jun 2021 04:14:13 -0400
Received: from regular1.263xmail.com ([211.150.70.201]:37114 "EHLO
        regular1.263xmail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S231481AbhFPION (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 16 Jun 2021 04:14:13 -0400
Received: from localhost (unknown [192.168.167.32])
        by regular1.263xmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C0E2F6A;
        Wed, 16 Jun 2021 16:11:53 +0800 (CST)
X-MAIL-GRAY: 0
X-MAIL-DELIVERY: 1
X-ADDR-CHECKED4: 1
X-SKE-CHECKED: 1
X-ABS-CHECKED: 1
X-ANTISPAM-LEVEL: 2
Received: from manjaro.uniontech.com (unknown [58.246.122.242])
        by smtp.263.net (postfix) whith ESMTP id P24497T139649611695872S1623831111955692_;
        Wed, 16 Jun 2021 16:11:52 +0800 (CST)
X-IP-DOMAINF: 1
X-UNIQUE-TAG: <6dac89850f76a041949d0214cc278a3c>
X-RL-SENDER: chenli@uniontech.com
X-SENDER: chenli@uniontech.com
X-LOGIN-NAME: chenli@uniontech.com
X-FST-TO: hch@infradead.org
X-RCPT-COUNT: 6
X-SENDER-IP: 58.246.122.242
X-ATTACHMENT-NUM: 0
X-System-Flag: 0
Date:   Wed, 16 Jun 2021 16:11:52 +0800
Message-ID: <8735tigref.wl-chenli@uniontech.com>
From:   Chen Li <chenli@uniontech.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc:     Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ramfs: skip mknod if inode already =?GB2312?B?ZXhp?=
 =?GB2312?B?c3RzLqG+x+vXotLio6zTyrz+08liYXR2K2FlODk4OWUxNjY4Zjg0YTc0ZDM3?=
 =?GB2312?B?KzY1MDYraW5mcmFkZWFkLm9yZytoY2hAY2FzcGVyLnNycy5pbmZyYWRlYWQu?=
 =?GB2312?B?b3JntPq3oqG/?=
In-Reply-To: <YMmHwTZaahtmjK2z@infradead.org>
References: <874kdyh65j.wl-chenli@uniontech.com>
        <YMmHwTZaahtmjK2z@infradead.org>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue)
 FLIM-LB/1.14.9 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Goj=F2?=) APEL-LB/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0
 Emacs/27.2 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 13:10:25 +0800,
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 10:53:12AM +0800, Chen Li wrote:
> > 
> > It's possible we try to mknod a dentry, which have
> > already bound to an inode, just skip it.
> 
> How do you think this could happen?
> 
> 

Sorry, that's my bad. I noticed unionfs used to do this check in 9c5b4452998c6e670cfde0928b277e9c50d9a676, but not sure is it a must.