From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>,
Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@netapp.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/1] destroy_creds.2: new page documenting destroy_creds()
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 17:17:34 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87378yr2sx.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1502281848.12841.2.camel@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1915 bytes --]
On Wed, Aug 09 2017, Jeff Layton wrote:
....
>
> Thanks, that helps a bit. I'm less clear on what the higher-level
> vision is here though:
>
> Are we all going to be running scripts on logout that scrape
> /proc/mounts and run fslogout on each? Will this be added to kdestroy?
>
> Or are you aiming to have KCM do this on some trigger? (see:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/KerberosKCMCache)
>
> Also, doing this per-mount seems wrong to me. Shouldn't this be done on
> a per-net-namespace basis or maybe even globally?
Having looked at the code, I think this is invalidating cached
credentials globally -- or at least, globally for all filesystems that
use sunrpc.
I actually question the premise for wanting to do this. Tickets have a
timeout and will expire. Any code that is allowed to get a ticket, can
hold on to it as long as it likes - but it will cease to work after the
expiry time. Hunting out all the places that a key might be cached, and
invalidating them, seems to deviate from the model. If you are concerned
about leaving credentials around where they can theoretically be
misused, then set a smaller expiry time.
What is the threat-model that this change is supposed to guard against?
Looking that the syscall itself:
1/ why restrict the call to directories only?
2/ Every new syscall should have a 'flags' argument, because you never
know when you'll need one.
NeilBrown
>
> It seems like we can afford to be rather cavalier about destroying
> creds here. Even if we purge creds for a user that should have remained
> valid, we just end up having to re-upcall for them, right?
> --
> Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-11 7:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-07 21:23 [RFC v3 0/3] VFS/NFS support to destroy FS credentials Olga Kornievskaia
2017-08-07 21:23 ` [RFC v3 1/3] VFS adding destroy_creds call Olga Kornievskaia
2017-08-07 21:23 ` [RFC 1/1] destroy_creds.2: new page documenting destroy_creds() Olga Kornievskaia
2017-08-09 12:30 ` Jeff Layton
2017-08-09 15:45 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2017-08-11 7:17 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2017-08-11 11:18 ` Jeff Layton
2017-08-11 14:05 ` Olga Kornievskaia
[not found] ` <E127503D-3DFC-4FD3-99F6-012D100C168B@netapp.com>
2017-08-11 14:22 ` Jeff Layton
2017-08-11 15:12 ` Trond Myklebust
2017-08-13 11:38 ` Jeff Layton
2017-08-14 15:43 ` Olga Kornievskaia
[not found] ` <CB7D102A-5711-4661-928F-3689895A1A5A@netapp.com>
2017-08-14 15:59 ` Jeff Layton
2017-08-11 13:37 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2017-08-11 14:09 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2017-08-09 16:08 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-08-09 16:44 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2017-08-07 21:23 ` [RFC v3 2/3] SUNRPC mark user credentials destroyed Olga Kornievskaia
2017-08-07 21:23 ` [RFC v3 3/3] NFS define vfs destroy_creds functions Olga Kornievskaia
2017-08-09 12:55 ` [RFC v3 0/3] VFS/NFS support to destroy FS credentials David Howells
2017-08-10 16:52 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2017-08-11 6:53 ` NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87378yr2sx.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name \
--to=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=kolga@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).