From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
Cc: agruen@kernel.org, bfields@fieldses.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
dhowells@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V7 25/26] ext4: Implement rich acl for ext4
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:13:40 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8739ep7cz7.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BCAE5666-30A1-484A-9808-B52E5B422A3F@dilger.ca>
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:41:15 -0600, Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca> wrote:
> On 2011-10-18, at 9:33 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >
> > Support the richacl permission model in ext4. The richacls are stored
> > in "system.richacl" xattrs.This need to be enabled by tune2fs or during
> > mkfs.ext4
>
> It isn't clear from your commit comment or the code what needs to be enabled by tune2fs or mkfs.ext4. Please list the specific ext4 feature
> that needs to be enabled.
The last patch explains the feature flag details
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1204873
I am adding a new compat feature flag to indicate richacl is
enabled.
>
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_EXT4_FS_RICHACL
> > +#define EXT4_IS_RICHACL(inode) IS_RICHACL(inode)
> >
>
> > +#else /* CONFIG_FS_EXT4_RICHACL */
> > +
> > +#define EXT4_IS_RICHACL(inode) (0)
>
> It is a bit confusing that you are using both EXT4_IS_RICHACL() and
> IS_RICHACL() in this code. Initially I thought EXT4_IS_RICHACL() was
> checking an ext4-specific inode flag, but it seems that it is instead
> conditional upon the configure flags.
>
The reason is to not do the superblock flag check when EXT4_FS_RICHACL is not
enabled.
> It looks like it should be possible to use EXT4_IS_RICHACL() in all
> of the code, since the richacl-specific code will not be compiled
> anyway.
>
The reasoning is, all richacl specific code do check for whether
MS_RICHACL is enabled or not and the common file system code does
something similar to EXT4_IS_RICHACL() that is (0) when the file
system is not compiled with richacl option.
-aneesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-19 5:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-18 15:32 [PATCH -V7 00/26] New ACL format for better NFSv4 acl interoperability Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 02/26] vfs: Add hex format for MAY_* flag values Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 03/26] vfs: Pass all mask flags down to iop->check_acl Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 04/26] vfs: Add a comment to inode_permission() Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 05/26] vfs: Add generic IS_ACL() test for acl support Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 06/26] vfs: Add IS_RICHACL() test for richacl support Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 07/26] vfs: Optimize out IS_RICHACL() if CONFIG_FS_RICHACL is not defined Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 08/26] vfs: Add new file and directory create permission flags Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-19 16:42 ` J. Bruce Fields
[not found] ` <20111019164216.GC30864-uC3wQj2KruNg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
2011-10-20 5:20 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 09/26] vfs: Add delete child and delete self " Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-19 22:09 ` J. Bruce Fields
[not found] ` <20111019220915.GA1874-uC3wQj2KruNg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
2011-10-20 7:35 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-20 8:11 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 12/26] vfs: Make acl_permission_check() work for richacls Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 13/26] richacl: In-memory representation and helper functions Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 14/26] richacl: Permission mapping functions Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 15/26] richacl: Compute maximum file masks from an acl Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 17/26] richacl: Permission check algorithm Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 18/26] richacl: Create-time inheritance Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 19/26] richacl: Check if an acl is equivalent to a file mode Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 20/26] richacl: Automatic Inheritance Aneesh Kumar K.V
[not found] ` <1318951981-5508-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 01/26] vfs: Indicate that the permission functions take all the MAY_* flags Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 10/26] vfs: Make the inode passed to inode_change_ok non-const Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 11/26] vfs: Add permission flags for setting file attributes Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 16/26] richacl: Update the file masks in chmod() Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 21/26] richacl: xattr mapping functions Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-19 22:20 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-20 8:30 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-20 9:14 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-20 9:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <20111020091946.GA23773-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
2011-10-20 10:25 ` J. Bruce Fields
[not found] ` <20111020102538.GG5444-uC3wQj2KruNg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
2011-10-20 23:46 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2011-10-21 0:45 ` J. Bruce Fields
[not found] ` <1319154390.2270.52.camel-AB3ohll6rUCZ4toXJV50QQ@public.gmane.org>
2011-10-21 9:40 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-21 10:52 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2011-10-21 13:12 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-21 23:58 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2011-10-20 11:02 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
[not found] ` <87aa8w53kj.fsf-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2011-10-20 17:49 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-20 19:49 ` Andreas Dilger
2011-11-19 9:35 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-11-19 9:28 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-11-21 13:35 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 22/26] vfs: Cache richacl in struct inode Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 23/26] vfs: Add richacl permission check Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 24/26] ext4: Use IS_POSIXACL() to check for POSIX ACL support Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:33 ` [PATCH -V7 25/26] ext4: Implement rich acl for ext4 Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 18:41 ` Andreas Dilger
2011-10-19 5:43 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2011-10-18 15:33 ` [PATCH -V7 26/26] ext4: Add Ext4 compat richacl feature flag Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 16:17 ` [PATCH -V7 00/26] New ACL format for better NFSv4 acl interoperability Shea Levy
2011-10-19 5:54 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-19 22:21 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8739ep7cz7.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=adilger@dilger.ca \
--cc=agruen@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).