From: Luis Henriques <luis@igalia.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: Bernd Schubert <bernd@bsbernd.com>,
Horst Birthelmer <horst@birthelmer.de>,
Jim Harris <jim.harris@nvidia.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mgurtovoy@nvidia.com, ksztyber@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fuse: skip lookup during atomic_open() when O_CREAT is set
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2026 16:43:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874in7wgv9.fsf@wotan.olymp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJfpeguoQ4qnvYvv2_-e7POXiPeBR2go_J68S2E6c-YW-1tYbA@mail.gmail.com> (Miklos Szeredi's message of "Mon, 23 Feb 2026 16:53:33 +0100")
On Mon, Feb 23 2026, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Feb 2026 at 16:37, Bernd Schubert <bernd@bsbernd.com> wrote:
>
>> After the discussion about LOOKUO_HANDLE my impression was actually that
>> we want to use compounds for the atomic open.
>
> I think we want to introduce an atomic operation that does a lookup +
> an optional mknod, lets call this LOOKUP_CREATE_FH, this would return
> a flag indicating whether the file was created or if it existed prior
> to the operation.
>
> Then, instead of the current CREATE operation there would be a
> compound with LOOKUP_CREATE_FH + OPEN.
>
> Does that make sense?
FWIW, what I've been doing is something slightly different. I have been
working on implementing MKOBJ_HANDLE+STATX+OPEN. And the plan was to rely
on the compound flags, leaving it to user-space to handle the atomicity
(e.g. MKOBJ_HANDLE would fail if O_EXCL was set).
I was hoping to share a draft of this very soon, though it's still
incomplete. For example, not all required compound operations are already
implemented, most notably readdirplus!
Cheers,
--
Luís
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-23 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-20 20:41 [PATCH] fuse: skip lookup during atomic_open() when O_CREAT is set Jim Harris
2026-02-21 15:19 ` Horst Birthelmer
2026-02-23 15:09 ` Miklos Szeredi
2026-02-23 15:36 ` Bernd Schubert
2026-02-23 15:53 ` Miklos Szeredi
2026-02-23 16:43 ` Luis Henriques [this message]
2026-02-23 16:48 ` Bernd Schubert
2026-02-23 18:55 ` Horst Birthelmer
2026-02-24 15:33 ` Miklos Szeredi
2026-02-26 23:11 ` Jim Harris
2026-02-27 7:59 ` Horst Birthelmer
2026-02-23 14:57 ` Miklos Szeredi
2026-02-23 16:41 ` Bernd Schubert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874in7wgv9.fsf@wotan.olymp \
--to=luis@igalia.com \
--cc=bernd@bsbernd.com \
--cc=horst@birthelmer.de \
--cc=jim.harris@nvidia.com \
--cc=ksztyber@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgurtovoy@nvidia.com \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox