linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
To: Andreas Gruenbacher
	<agruen-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	"J. Bruce Fields"
	<bfields-uC3wQj2KruNg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>,
	akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org,
	viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org,
	dhowells-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V7 21/26] richacl: xattr mapping functions
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 15:10:17 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <874nz265tq.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1319154390.2270.52.camel-AB3ohll6rUCZ4toXJV50QQ@public.gmane.org>

On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 01:46:29 +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 06:25 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 05:19:46AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 05:14:34AM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > > > > > Does it really make sense to use a string here just to pick between the
> > > > > > three choices OWNER@, GROUP@, and EVERYONE@?  Why not just another small
> > > > > > integer?  Is the goal to expand this somehow eventually?
> > > > > 
> > > 
> > > > > I guess Andreas wanted the disk layout to be able to store user@domain
> > > > > format if needed.
> 
> Yep.  On the other hand, none of the code won't actually allow to use
> user@domain identifiers, it won't help with other identifier types like
> Windows SIDs, and it doesn't make the code any prettier, so this should
> probably go away.
> 
> > > > Is that likely?  For that to be useful, tasks would need to be able to
> > > > run as user@domain strings.  And we'd probably want owners and groups to
> > > > also be user@domain strings.
> 
> I really don't see this happen anytime soon, and likely not at all.
> 
> > > > The container people seem to eventually want to add some kind of
> > > > namespace identifier everywhere:
> > > > 
> > > > 	http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131836778427871&w=2
> > > > 
> > > > in which case I guess we'd likely end up with (uid, user namespace id)
> > > > instead of user@domain?
> 
> The filesystem still wouldn't have namespace ids for the owner and
> owning group, which is a much bigger issue.  I think we're safe not to
> worry about namespace ids at this point; they also might never happen.
> 
> > > Storing strings is an extremly stupid idea.  The only thing that would
> > > make sense would be storing a windows-style 128-bit GUID.
> > > 
> > 
> > So if we want to do this without strings:
> > 
> > > > > +struct richace_xattr {
> > > > > + __le16          e_type;
> > > > > + __le16          e_flags;
> > > > > + __le32          e_mask;
> > > > > + __le32          e_id;
> > > > > + char            e_who[0];
> > 
> > We could drop that last field and use some predefined values for e_id to
> > represent owner/group/everyone in the e_type == ACE4_SPECIAL_WHO case.
> 
> That makes sense to me.
> 
> There seems to be a WELL_KNOWN_SID_TYPE enumeration which maps those
> kinds of special identifiers to small integers in Windows; maybe it
> makes sense to use the same numbers for OWNER@, GROUP@, and EVERYONE@.
> 
> > Then I'm not sure how you'd extend it if you later decided to add
> > Windows GUID's or whatever.
> > 
> > But maybe it's not realistic to expect to be able to do that without a
> > new interface and on-disk format: how could old software be expected to
> > deal with acls that didn't use uid's?
> 
> The acl itself has a version field, so new formats could be introduced
> in the future with a new version.

How about the below change. This will require richacl tools change
also. I made the e_flags 32 bit to make sure we don't take the space
needed NFSv4 ACL related flags.

diff --git a/fs/richacl_base.c b/fs/richacl_base.c
index 9a57039..9179fcd 100644
--- a/fs/richacl_base.c
+++ b/fs/richacl_base.c
@@ -20,19 +20,6 @@
 
 MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
 
-/*
- * Special e_who identifiers:  ACEs which have ACE4_SPECIAL_WHO set in
- * ace->e_flags use these constants in ace->u.e_who.
- *
- * For efficiency, we compare pointers instead of comparing strings.
- */
-const char richace_owner_who[]	  = "OWNER@";
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(richace_owner_who);
-const char richace_group_who[]	  = "GROUP@";
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(richace_group_who);
-const char richace_everyone_who[] = "EVERYONE@";
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(richace_everyone_who);
-
 /**
  * richacl_alloc  -  allocate a richacl
  * @count:	number of entries
@@ -191,41 +178,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(richacl_want_to_mask);
 int
 richace_is_same_identifier(const struct richace *a, const struct richace *b)
 {
-#define WHO_FLAGS (ACE4_SPECIAL_WHO | ACE4_IDENTIFIER_GROUP)
+#define WHO_FLAGS (ACE4_SPECIAL_WHO | ACE4_UNIXID_WHO | ACE4_IDENTIFIER_GROUP)
 	if ((a->e_flags & WHO_FLAGS) != (b->e_flags & WHO_FLAGS))
 		return 0;
-	if (a->e_flags & ACE4_SPECIAL_WHO)
-		return a->u.e_who == b->u.e_who;
-	else
-		return a->u.e_id == b->u.e_id;
+	return a->e_id == b->e_id;
 #undef WHO_FLAGS
 }
 
 /**
- * richacl_set_who  -  set a special who value
- * @ace:	acl entry
- * @who:	who value to use
- */
-int
-richace_set_who(struct richace *ace, const char *who)
-{
-	if (!strcmp(who, richace_owner_who))
-		who = richace_owner_who;
-	else if (!strcmp(who, richace_group_who))
-		who = richace_group_who;
-	else if (!strcmp(who, richace_everyone_who))
-		who = richace_everyone_who;
-	else
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	ace->u.e_who = who;
-	ace->e_flags |= ACE4_SPECIAL_WHO;
-	ace->e_flags &= ~ACE4_IDENTIFIER_GROUP;
-	return 0;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(richace_set_who);
-
-/**
  * richacl_allowed_to_who  -  mask flags allowed to a specific who value
  *
  * Computes the mask values allowed to a specific who value, taking
@@ -446,10 +406,10 @@ richacl_permission(struct inode *inode, const struct richacl *acl,
 				continue;
 		} else if (richace_is_unix_id(ace)) {
 			if (ace->e_flags & ACE4_IDENTIFIER_GROUP) {
-				if (!in_group_p(ace->u.e_id))
+				if (!in_group_p(ace->e_id))
 					continue;
 			} else {
-				if (current_fsuid() != ace->u.e_id)
+				if (current_fsuid() != ace->e_id)
 					continue;
 			}
 		} else
diff --git a/fs/richacl_xattr.c b/fs/richacl_xattr.c
index 02a7986..3f1f557 100644
--- a/fs/richacl_xattr.c
+++ b/fs/richacl_xattr.c
@@ -58,19 +58,14 @@ richacl_from_xattr(const void *value, size_t size)
 		goto fail_einval;
 
 	richacl_for_each_entry(ace, acl) {
-		const char *who = (void *)(xattr_ace + 1), *end;
-		ssize_t used = (void *)who - value;
 
-		if (used > size)
-			goto fail_einval;
-		end = memchr(who, 0, size - used);
-		if (!end)
+		if (((void *)xattr_ace + sizeof(*xattr_ace)) > value + size)
 			goto fail_einval;
 
-		ace->e_type = le16_to_cpu(xattr_ace->e_type);
-		ace->e_flags = le16_to_cpu(xattr_ace->e_flags);
-		ace->e_mask = le32_to_cpu(xattr_ace->e_mask);
-		ace->u.e_id = le32_to_cpu(xattr_ace->e_id);
+		ace->e_type  = le16_to_cpu(xattr_ace->e_type);
+		ace->e_flags = le32_to_cpu(xattr_ace->e_flags);
+		ace->e_mask  = le32_to_cpu(xattr_ace->e_mask);
+		ace->e_id    = le32_to_cpu(xattr_ace->e_id);
 
 		if (ace->e_flags & ~ACE4_VALID_FLAGS)
 			goto fail_einval;
@@ -78,13 +73,7 @@ richacl_from_xattr(const void *value, size_t size)
 		    (ace->e_mask & ~ACE4_VALID_MASK))
 			goto fail_einval;
 
-		if (who == end) {
-			if (ace->u.e_id == -1)
-				goto fail_einval;  /* uid/gid needed */
-		} else if (richace_set_who(ace, who))
-			goto fail_einval;
-
-		xattr_ace = (void *)who + ALIGN(end - who + 1, 4);
+		xattr_ace = xattr_ace + 1;
 	}
 
 	return acl;
@@ -102,13 +91,8 @@ size_t
 richacl_xattr_size(const struct richacl *acl)
 {
 	size_t size = sizeof(struct richacl_xattr);
-	const struct richace *ace;
 
-	richacl_for_each_entry(ace, acl) {
-		size += sizeof(struct richace_xattr) +
-			(richace_is_unix_id(ace) ? 4 :
-			 ALIGN(strlen(ace->u.e_who) + 1, 4));
-	}
+	size += sizeof(struct richace_xattr) * acl->a_count;
 	return size;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(richacl_xattr_size);
@@ -136,21 +120,11 @@ richacl_to_xattr(const struct richacl *acl, void *buffer)
 	xattr_ace = (void *)(xattr_acl + 1);
 	richacl_for_each_entry(ace, acl) {
 		xattr_ace->e_type = cpu_to_le16(ace->e_type);
-		xattr_ace->e_flags = cpu_to_le16(ace->e_flags &
+		xattr_ace->e_flags = cpu_to_le32(ace->e_flags &
 						 ACE4_VALID_FLAGS);
 		xattr_ace->e_mask = cpu_to_le32(ace->e_mask);
-		if (richace_is_unix_id(ace)) {
-			xattr_ace->e_id = cpu_to_le32(ace->u.e_id);
-			memset(xattr_ace->e_who, 0, 4);
-			xattr_ace = (void *)xattr_ace->e_who + 4;
-		} else {
-			int sz = ALIGN(strlen(ace->u.e_who) + 1, 4);
-
-			xattr_ace->e_id = cpu_to_le32(-1);
-			memset(xattr_ace->e_who + sz - 4, 0, 4);
-			strcpy(xattr_ace->e_who, ace->u.e_who);
-			xattr_ace = (void *)xattr_ace->e_who + sz;
-		}
+		xattr_ace->e_id = cpu_to_le32(ace->e_id);
+		xattr_ace = xattr_ace + 1;
 	}
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(richacl_to_xattr);
diff --git a/include/linux/richacl.h b/include/linux/richacl.h
index 4af6d22..e4c5156 100644
--- a/include/linux/richacl.h
+++ b/include/linux/richacl.h
@@ -17,14 +17,15 @@
 #define __RICHACL_H
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 
+#define ACE_OWNER_ID		130
+#define ACE_GROUP_ID		131
+#define ACE_EVERYONE_ID		110
+
 struct richace {
 	unsigned short	e_type;
-	unsigned short	e_flags;
+	unsigned int	e_flags;
 	unsigned int	e_mask;
-	union {
-		unsigned int	e_id;
-		const char	*e_who;
-	} u;
+	unsigned int	e_id;
 };
 
 struct richacl {
@@ -74,8 +75,10 @@ struct richacl {
 /*#define ACE4_FAILED_ACCESS_ACE_FLAG	0x0020*/
 #define ACE4_IDENTIFIER_GROUP		0x0040
 #define ACE4_INHERITED_ACE		0x0080
-/* in-memory representation only */
-#define ACE4_SPECIAL_WHO		0x4000
+/* richacl specific flag values */
+#define ACE4_SPECIAL_WHO		0x80000000
+#define ACE4_UNIXID_WHO			0x40000000
+
 
 #define ACE4_VALID_FLAGS (			\
 	ACE4_FILE_INHERIT_ACE |			\
@@ -83,7 +86,9 @@ struct richacl {
 	ACE4_NO_PROPAGATE_INHERIT_ACE |		\
 	ACE4_INHERIT_ONLY_ACE |			\
 	ACE4_IDENTIFIER_GROUP |			\
-	ACE4_INHERITED_ACE)
+	ACE4_INHERITED_ACE |			\
+	ACE4_SPECIAL_WHO |			\
+	ACE4_UNIXID_WHO)
 
 /* e_mask bitflags */
 #define ACE4_READ_DATA			0x00000001
@@ -254,14 +259,6 @@ richacl_is_protected(const struct richacl *acl)
 	return acl->a_flags & ACL4_PROTECTED;
 }
 
-/*
- * Special e_who identifiers: we use these pointer values in comparisons
- * instead of doing a strcmp.
- */
-extern const char richace_owner_who[];
-extern const char richace_group_who[];
-extern const char richace_everyone_who[];
-
 /**
  * richace_is_owner  -  check if @ace is an OWNER@ entry
  */
@@ -269,7 +266,7 @@ static inline int
 richace_is_owner(const struct richace *ace)
 {
 	return (ace->e_flags & ACE4_SPECIAL_WHO) &&
-	       ace->u.e_who == richace_owner_who;
+	       ace->e_id == ACE_OWNER_ID;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -279,7 +276,7 @@ static inline int
 richace_is_group(const struct richace *ace)
 {
 	return (ace->e_flags & ACE4_SPECIAL_WHO) &&
-	       ace->u.e_who == richace_group_who;
+	       ace->e_id == ACE_GROUP_ID;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -289,7 +286,7 @@ static inline int
 richace_is_everyone(const struct richace *ace)
 {
 	return (ace->e_flags & ACE4_SPECIAL_WHO) &&
-	       ace->u.e_who == richace_everyone_who;
+	       ace->e_id == ACE_EVERYONE_ID;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -298,7 +295,7 @@ richace_is_everyone(const struct richace *ace)
 static inline int
 richace_is_unix_id(const struct richace *ace)
 {
-	return !(ace->e_flags & ACE4_SPECIAL_WHO);
+	return (ace->e_flags & ACE4_UNIXID_WHO);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -357,7 +354,7 @@ richace_is_deny(const struct richace *ace)
 extern struct richacl *richacl_alloc(int);
 extern int richace_is_same_identifier(const struct richace *,
 				      const struct richace *);
-extern int richace_set_who(struct richace *, const char *);
+extern int richace_set_who(struct richace *, const u8*, u_int32_t);
 extern int richacl_masks_to_mode(const struct richacl *);
 extern unsigned int richacl_mode_to_mask(mode_t);
 extern unsigned int richacl_want_to_mask(unsigned int);
diff --git a/include/linux/richacl_xattr.h b/include/linux/richacl_xattr.h
index f79ec12..19cb61e 100644
--- a/include/linux/richacl_xattr.h
+++ b/include/linux/richacl_xattr.h
@@ -22,10 +22,9 @@
 
 struct richace_xattr {
 	__le16		e_type;
-	__le16		e_flags;
+	__le32		e_flags;
 	__le32		e_mask;
 	__le32		e_id;
-	char		e_who[0];
 };
 
 struct richacl_xattr {

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-10-21  9:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-18 15:32 [PATCH -V7 00/26] New ACL format for better NFSv4 acl interoperability Aneesh Kumar K.V
     [not found] ` <1318951981-5508-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2011-10-18 15:32   ` [PATCH -V7 01/26] vfs: Indicate that the permission functions take all the MAY_* flags Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32   ` [PATCH -V7 10/26] vfs: Make the inode passed to inode_change_ok non-const Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32   ` [PATCH -V7 11/26] vfs: Add permission flags for setting file attributes Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32   ` [PATCH -V7 16/26] richacl: Update the file masks in chmod() Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32   ` [PATCH -V7 21/26] richacl: xattr mapping functions Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-19 22:20     ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-20  8:30       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-20  9:14         ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-20  9:19           ` Christoph Hellwig
     [not found]             ` <20111020091946.GA23773-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
2011-10-20 10:25               ` J. Bruce Fields
     [not found]                 ` <20111020102538.GG5444-uC3wQj2KruNg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
2011-10-20 23:46                   ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2011-10-21  0:45                     ` J. Bruce Fields
     [not found]                     ` <1319154390.2270.52.camel-AB3ohll6rUCZ4toXJV50QQ@public.gmane.org>
2011-10-21  9:40                       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2011-10-21 10:52                         ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2011-10-21 13:12                           ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-21 23:58                             ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2011-10-20 11:02               ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
     [not found]                 ` <87aa8w53kj.fsf-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2011-10-20 17:49                   ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-20 19:49                     ` Andreas Dilger
2011-11-19  9:35                       ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-11-19  9:28                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-11-21 13:35                       ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 02/26] vfs: Add hex format for MAY_* flag values Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 03/26] vfs: Pass all mask flags down to iop->check_acl Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 04/26] vfs: Add a comment to inode_permission() Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 05/26] vfs: Add generic IS_ACL() test for acl support Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 06/26] vfs: Add IS_RICHACL() test for richacl support Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 07/26] vfs: Optimize out IS_RICHACL() if CONFIG_FS_RICHACL is not defined Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 08/26] vfs: Add new file and directory create permission flags Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-19 16:42   ` J. Bruce Fields
     [not found]     ` <20111019164216.GC30864-uC3wQj2KruNg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
2011-10-20  5:20       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 09/26] vfs: Add delete child and delete self " Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-19 22:09   ` J. Bruce Fields
     [not found]     ` <20111019220915.GA1874-uC3wQj2KruNg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
2011-10-20  7:35       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-20  8:11         ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 12/26] vfs: Make acl_permission_check() work for richacls Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 13/26] richacl: In-memory representation and helper functions Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 14/26] richacl: Permission mapping functions Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 15/26] richacl: Compute maximum file masks from an acl Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 17/26] richacl: Permission check algorithm Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 18/26] richacl: Create-time inheritance Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 19/26] richacl: Check if an acl is equivalent to a file mode Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 20/26] richacl: Automatic Inheritance Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 22/26] vfs: Cache richacl in struct inode Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 23/26] vfs: Add richacl permission check Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 24/26] ext4: Use IS_POSIXACL() to check for POSIX ACL support Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:33 ` [PATCH -V7 25/26] ext4: Implement rich acl for ext4 Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 18:41   ` Andreas Dilger
2011-10-19  5:43     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:33 ` [PATCH -V7 26/26] ext4: Add Ext4 compat richacl feature flag Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 16:17 ` [PATCH -V7 00/26] New ACL format for better NFSv4 acl interoperability Shea Levy
2011-10-19  5:54   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-19 22:21 ` J. Bruce Fields

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=874nz265tq.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=aneesh.kumar-23vcf4htsmix0ybbhkvfkdbpr1lh4cv8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=agruen-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=bfields-uC3wQj2KruNg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=dhowells-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=hch-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).