From: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: Adi Nata <adinata.softwareengineer@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kunit: fat: test cluster and directory i_pos layout helpers
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 12:06:23 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877bqbeez4.fsf@mail.parknet.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y0j2m1d0.fsf@mail.parknet.co.jp>
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp> writes:
Hi, Christian. ping?
> Adi Nata <adinata.softwareengineer@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Add KUnit coverage for fat_clus_to_blknr() and fat_get_blknr_offset()
>> using stub msdos_sb_info values so cluster-to-sector and i_pos split
>> math stays correct.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Adi Nata <adinata.softwareengineer@gmail.com>
>
> Looks good.
>
> Acked-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
>
> Thanks.
>
>> ---
>> fs/fat/fat_test.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/fat/fat_test.c b/fs/fat/fat_test.c
>> index 1f0062659067..add44178f28e 100644
>> --- a/fs/fat/fat_test.c
>> +++ b/fs/fat/fat_test.c
>> @@ -20,6 +20,37 @@ static void fat_checksum_test(struct kunit *test)
>> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, fat_checksum("ABCDEFGHA "), (u8)98);
>> }
>>
>> +static void fat_clus_to_blknr_test(struct kunit *test)
>> +{
>> + struct msdos_sb_info sbi = {
>> + .sec_per_clus = 4,
>> + .data_start = 100,
>> + };
>> +
>> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (sector_t)100,
>> + fat_clus_to_blknr(&sbi, FAT_START_ENT));
>> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (sector_t)112, fat_clus_to_blknr(&sbi, 5));
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void fat_get_blknr_offset_test(struct kunit *test)
>> +{
>> + struct msdos_sb_info sbi = {
>> + .dir_per_block = 16,
>> + .dir_per_block_bits = 4,
>> + };
>> +
>> + sector_t blknr;
>> + int offset;
>> +
>> + fat_get_blknr_offset(&sbi, 0, &blknr, &offset);
>> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (sector_t)0, blknr);
>> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, offset);
>> +
>> + fat_get_blknr_offset(&sbi, (10 << 4) | 7, &blknr, &offset);
>> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (sector_t)10, blknr);
>> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 7, offset);
>> +}
>> +
>> struct fat_timestamp_testcase {
>> const char *name;
>> struct timespec64 ts;
>> @@ -181,6 +212,8 @@ static void fat_time_unix2fat_test(struct kunit *test)
>>
>> static struct kunit_case fat_test_cases[] = {
>> KUNIT_CASE(fat_checksum_test),
>> + KUNIT_CASE(fat_clus_to_blknr_test),
>> + KUNIT_CASE(fat_get_blknr_offset_test),
>> KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(fat_time_fat2unix_test, fat_time_gen_params),
>> KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(fat_time_unix2fat_test, fat_time_gen_params),
>> {},
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-13 3:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260405011920.28622-1-adinata.softwareengineer@gmail.com>
2026-04-05 5:18 ` [PATCH] kunit: fat: test cluster and directory i_pos layout helpers OGAWA Hirofumi
2026-04-13 3:06 ` OGAWA Hirofumi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877bqbeez4.fsf@mail.parknet.co.jp \
--to=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
--cc=adinata.softwareengineer@gmail.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox