linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Cc: "linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iomap: don't lose folio dropbehind state for overwrites
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2025 23:16:32 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <878qma9guf.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a61432ad-fa05-4547-ab82-8d2f74d84038@kernel.dk>

Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> writes:

> DONTCACHE I/O must have the completion punted to a workqueue, just like
> what is done for unwritten extents, as the completion needs task context
> to perform the invalidation of the folio(s). However, if writeback is
> started off filemap_fdatawrite_range() off generic_sync() and it's an
> overwrite, then the DONTCACHE marking gets lost as iomap_add_to_ioend()
> don't look at the folio being added and no further state is passed down
> to help it know that this is a dropbehind/DONTCACHE write.
>
> Check if the folio being added is marked as dropbehind, and set
> IOMAP_IOEND_DONTCACHE if that is the case. Then XFS can factor this into
> the decision making of completion context in xfs_submit_ioend().
> Additionally include this ioend flag in the NOMERGE flags, to avoid
> mixing it with unrelated IO.
>
> This fixes extra page cache being instantiated when the write performed
> is an overwrite, rather than newly instantiated blocks.
>
> Fixes: b2cd5ae693a3 ("iomap: make buffered writes work with RWF_DONTCACHE")
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
>
> ---
>
> Found this one while testing the unrelated issue of invalidation being a
> bit broken before 6.15 release. We need this to ensure that overwrites
> also prune correctly, just like unwritten extents currently do.

I guess I did report this to you a while ago when I was adding support
for uncahed buffered-io to xfs_io. But I never heard back from you :( 

https://lore.kernel.org/all/87h649trof.fsf@gmail.com/

No worries, good that we finally have this fixed.

-ritesh

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-06-02 17:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-27 15:43 [PATCH] iomap: don't lose folio dropbehind state for overwrites Jens Axboe
2025-05-27 21:12 ` Dave Chinner
2025-05-27 21:17   ` Jens Axboe
2025-06-02 17:46 ` Ritesh Harjani [this message]
2025-06-02 18:04   ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=878qma9guf.fsf@gmail.com \
    --to=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).