From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41B18283684; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 13:26:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1745328414; cv=none; b=eV3osiF/TLCdEDUGKQR/tlN7CeWJzQIhZKQumZEvRRiU0ABwgoSG58nDBN4j81EOuq+6DcE9ClH/C8N35kaBOwfL/g7tUqdMMsgrGHLOJP452mvnzmIHuJgMyV0j/Ei0afOOVdbmVEDCrbtOq1gbQ43tB9aD+K77P7Zcxa7Elkc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1745328414; c=relaxed/simple; bh=OrnCZxS+iHOuq2RV9EN8sUBJCDi/vIe+MYux5FGlJrY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=RIdYGtCfyjkzEdJFncVrlh1UdP6GbE0Mtub3uLiOJBi0prrvz2NT95T8ltRNArF4Bi5F2iAMv1zYqtP7MhgdLTLnA+VjPBARkKnkyjnDSNf2e/Yp3HNZjpoWDQCBNz12zmOMRJZV0UubuEEVXROUpblJfCPkCaLylUlzOrHubV4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Hjc3CEnV; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Hjc3CEnV" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6CC01C4CEE9; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 13:26:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1745328412; bh=OrnCZxS+iHOuq2RV9EN8sUBJCDi/vIe+MYux5FGlJrY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=Hjc3CEnVZg+dYilU/nvEXtKsO+isKJLPex10Vb/7vTTnYWaK2L0pLk2dGaFgYimU3 0Fzz58OyStxgeBbh/LtQVaghBK0UtL2iwvndv1RvRsZ9yFLPZJEG4MjfBf/R8l7Bu2 YaE0goFFGPiu78PmfATyk5pgqhtD5BLfbMNr48S6IhIkKqC939xDhTxf76pPT74aF+ ORTd+4WFrEbpGzDwwk7Nx2Lz7jitPgGk5vVZlWOGO5W5UoKnhXqwtRXRrcHT6zMToK y+Cp5qB7jzzhBvG4RNQ8qksjnO+mA293UsfPowL2p7VWm1svQa2hcwePQgPWFL5Cij oqMpzq/h2XLCw== From: Andreas Hindborg To: Christian Brauner Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Breno Leitao Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: configfs: add Andreas Hindborg as maintainer In-Reply-To: <871pu5vdu8.fsf@kernel.org> (Andreas Hindborg's message of "Sun, 06 Apr 2025 11:28:15 +0200") References: <87frix5dk3.fsf@kernel.org> <20250403-sauer-himmel-df90d0e9047c@brauner> <20250404-komodowaran-erspielen-cc2dcbcda3e3@brauner> <871pu5vdu8.fsf@kernel.org> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.7; emacs 30.1 Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 15:26:39 +0200 Message-ID: <878qns9vjk.fsf@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Hi All, Andreas Hindborg writes: > Hi Joel, > > "Joel Becker" writes: > >> On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 10:42:29AM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 11:47:23PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>> > On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 01:27:27PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: >>> > > There's no need to get upset. Several people pointed out that Joel >>> > > Becker retired and since he hasn't responded this felt like the right >>> > > thing to do. Just send a patch to add him back. I see no reason to not >>> > > have Andreas step up to maintain it. >>> > >>> > Removing someone just because they have retired feels odd, but hey who >>> > am I to complain. I did reach out to him when giving maintainership >>> > and he replied although it did indeed take a while. >>> >>> I mean, we can surely put Joel back in. My take would be to remove >>> that person from the maintainer entry because people will get confused >>> when they don't receive a reply. But I'm totally fine if we should leave >>> Joel in. >> >> Howdy folks, >> >> I do apologize for my delayed responses. I try to review patches as I >> find them, but I haven't yet set up a dedicated tree -- a bit out of >> practice. > > How would you like the maintainer entry to look: > > - Are you OK with me taking up maintenance of configfs? > - If yes, > - would you like to be added as a reviewer? > - would you prefer to be listed as co-maintainer? > - If no, > - would you have me as a co-maintainer? > - or would you have me as a reviewer? > > I set up a tree according to the patch I submitted. I did not switch out > linux-next yet, but I was about to send a request to do that. I will > stall that pending your response on the above. Since I got no response on the above, I am going to continue setting up. Best regards, Andreas Hindborg