From: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
ojaswin@linux.ibm.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: iomap: Add missing flags description
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2025 00:00:40 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878qobzuwf.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250407162527.GC6266@frogsfrogsfrogs>
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org> writes:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 11:52:27PM +0530, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) wrote:
>> Let's document the use of these flags in iomap design doc where other
>> flags are defined too -
>>
>> - IOMAP_F_BOUNDARY was added by XFS to prevent merging of ioends
>> across RTG boundaries.
>> - IOMAP_F_ATOMIC_BIO was added for supporting atomic I/O operations
>> for filesystems to inform the iomap that it needs HW-offload based
>> mechanism for torn-write protection
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/filesystems/iomap/design.rst | 10 ++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/iomap/design.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/iomap/design.rst
>> index e29651a42eec..b916e85bc930 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/iomap/design.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/iomap/design.rst
>> @@ -243,6 +243,11 @@ The fields are as follows:
>> regular file data.
>> This is only useful for FIEMAP.
>>
>> + * **IOMAP_F_BOUNDARY**: This indicates that I/O and I/O completions
>> + for this iomap must never be merged with the mapping before it.
>> + Currently XFS uses this to prevent merging of ioends across RTG
>> + (realtime group) boundaries.
>
> Hrm, ok. Based on hch's comment about not mentioning specific fs
> behavior, I think I'll suggest something more like:
>
> IOMAP_F_BOUNDARY: This I/O and its completion must not be merged with
> any other I/O or completion. Filesystems must use this when submitting
> I/O to devices that cannot handle I/O crossing certain LBAs (e.g. ZNS
> devices). This flag applies only to buffered I/O writeback; all other
> functions ignore it.
>
Sure.
>> * **IOMAP_F_PRIVATE**: Starting with this value, the upper bits can
>> be set by the filesystem for its own purposes.
>>
>> @@ -250,6 +255,11 @@ The fields are as follows:
>> block assigned to it yet and the file system will do that in the bio
>> submission handler, splitting the I/O as needed.
>>
>> + * **IOMAP_F_ATOMIC_BIO**: Indicates that write I/O must be submitted
>> + with the ``REQ_ATOMIC`` flag set in the bio. Filesystems need to set
>> + this flag to inform iomap that the write I/O operation requires
>> + torn-write protection based on HW-offload mechanism.
>
> They must also ensure that mapping updates upon the completion of the
> I/O must be performed in a single metadata update.
>
Thanks Darrick, for the clarification and the review comments on this
patch. Once the remaining tracing patch is reviewed, I will incorporate
these comments in v2.
-ritesh
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-07 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-03 18:22 [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: iomap: Add missing flags description Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2025-04-03 18:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] iomap: trace: Add missing flags to [IOMAP_|IOMAP_F_]FLAGS_STRINGS Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2025-04-07 18:48 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-04 9:36 ` [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: iomap: Add missing flags description John Garry
2025-04-04 10:23 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-04-07 8:45 ` John Garry
2025-04-07 16:37 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-07 8:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-07 16:43 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-07 16:17 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-07 16:25 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-07 18:30 ` Ritesh Harjani [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878qobzuwf.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).