From: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
brauner@kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org, hch@lst.de,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, dchinner@redhat.com,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ojaswin@linux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com, tytso@mit.edu,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] iomap: rework IOMAP atomic flags
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2025 19:12:02 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bjtrsw2d.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250323063850.GA30703@lst.de>
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> writes:
> On Sun, Mar 23, 2025 at 01:17:08AM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
>
> [full quote deleted, can you please properly trim your replies?]
>
Sure.
>> So, I guess we can shift IOMAP_F_SIZE_CHANGED and IOMAP_F_STALE by
>> 1 bit. So it will all look like..
>
> Let's create some more space to avoid this for the next round, e.g.
Sure, that make sense.
> count the core set flags from 31 down, and limit IOMAP_F_PRIVATE to a
> single flag, which is how it is used.
flags in struct iomap is of type u16. So will make core iomap flags
starting from bit 15, moving downwards.
Here is a diff of what I think you meant - let me know if this diff
looks good to you?
diff --git a/include/linux/iomap.h b/include/linux/iomap.h
index 02fe001feebb..68416b135151 100644
--- a/include/linux/iomap.h
+++ b/include/linux/iomap.h
@@ -78,6 +78,11 @@ struct vm_fault;
#define IOMAP_F_ANON_WRITE (1U << 7)
#define IOMAP_F_ATOMIC_BIO (1U << 8)
+/*
+ * Flag reserved for file system specific usage
+ */
+#define IOMAP_F_PRIVATE (1U << 12)
+
/*
* Flags set by the core iomap code during operations:
*
@@ -88,14 +93,8 @@ struct vm_fault;
* range it covers needs to be remapped by the high level before the operation
* can proceed.
*/
-#define IOMAP_F_SIZE_CHANGED (1U << 8)
-#define IOMAP_F_STALE (1U << 9)
-
-/*
- * Flags from 0x1000 up are for file system specific usage:
- */
-#define IOMAP_F_PRIVATE (1U << 12)
-
+#define IOMAP_F_SIZE_CHANGED (1U << 14)
+#define IOMAP_F_STALE (1U << 15)
/*
* Magic value for addr:
(PS: I might be on transit / travel for some other work for a week. My reponses may be delayed.)
-ritesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-23 14:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-20 12:02 [PATCH 0/3] further iomap large atomic writes changes John Garry
2025-03-20 12:02 ` [PATCH 1/3] iomap: inline iomap_dio_bio_opflags() John Garry
2025-03-20 12:02 ` [PATCH 2/3] iomap: comment on atomic write checks in iomap_dio_bio_iter() John Garry
2025-03-20 14:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-20 19:32 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-03-20 12:02 ` [PATCH 3/3] iomap: rework IOMAP atomic flags John Garry
2025-03-20 14:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-20 19:29 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-03-22 19:47 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-03-23 6:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-23 13:07 ` John Garry
2025-03-23 13:42 ` Ritesh Harjani [this message]
2025-03-26 15:50 ` John Garry
2025-03-27 10:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-20 14:16 ` [PATCH 0/3] further iomap large atomic writes changes Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bjtrsw2d.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).