From: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pipe: fix race with fcntl
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 20:52:44 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bnitz11v.fsf@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150412173458.GO889@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1584 bytes --]
Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> writes:
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 09:08:21PM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
>> Fix other long standing issues caused by fcntl(,F_SETFL,):
>> - User can disable O_DIRECT for pipe[1] (paketized IO), but can not enable it again.
>> - Currently we do not set O_APPEND on pipe[1] (IMHO it is wrong, but let it be)
>> so it is reasonable to completely prohibit change O_APPEND flag on both
>> end's of pipe. Add ->check_flags method in order to diallow O_APPEND toggling.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
>> ---
>
> TBH, all those ->direct_IO != NULL checks seem to be a wrong approach.
> If nothing else, it forces several filesystem into inventing a fake
> ->direct_IO just to fool those tests. How about we
> * introduce FMODE_MAY_DIRECT and allow ->open() explicitly set it
> * make open_check_o_direct() and fcntl.c check that instead of poking
> in ->f_mapping->a_ops, etc.
> * provide a variant of generic_file_open() that would set that
> bit and use it on the filesystems that handle dio
100% agree. FMODE is perfect place for that.
BTW: I always wondering: why we do not mark pipe[1]->f_flags with O_APPEND?
Probably the answer is that nobody care about ->f_flags since no_llseek
returns -ESPIPE, but f_flags are visiable via fcntl so IMHO it is
reasonable to fix that too.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 472 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-12 17:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-12 17:08 [PATCH 0/2] fs: make pipe/splice fcntl safe Dmitry Monakhov
2015-04-12 17:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] pipe: fix race with fcntl Dmitry Monakhov
2015-04-12 17:34 ` Al Viro
2015-04-12 17:52 ` Dmitry Monakhov [this message]
2015-04-12 17:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] splice: fix race beween splice_write vs fcntl Dmitry Monakhov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bnitz11v.fsf@openvz.org \
--to=dmonakhov@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).