Re: [syzbot] [iomap?] kernel BUG in folio_end_read (2)

[John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>]

On 2025-11-06, John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de> wrote:
>> I think that we should do the following:
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.c b/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.c
>> index 839f504db6d3..78e02711872e 100644
>> --- a/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.c
>> +++ b/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.c
>> @@ -1260,9 +1260,8 @@ static const char *get_data(struct prb_data_ring *data_ring,
>>  		return NULL;
>>  	}
>>  
>> -	/* Regular data block: @begin less than @next and in same wrap. */
>> -	if (!is_blk_wrapped(data_ring, blk_lpos->begin, blk_lpos->next) &&
>> -	    blk_lpos->begin < blk_lpos->next) {
>> +	/* Regular data block: @begin and @next in same wrap. */
>> +	if (!is_blk_wrapped(data_ring, blk_lpos->begin, blk_lpos->next)) {
>>  		db = to_block(data_ring, blk_lpos->begin);
>>  		*data_size = blk_lpos->next - blk_lpos->begin;

Upon further consideration, your suggestion here is better. The wrapping
data block detection should continue to make sure there is exactly one 1
wrap. The size check will not catch the case where there are multiple
wraps.

John