linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, tytso@mit.edu, jack@suse.cz,
	willy@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] fs: introduce new writeback error tracking infrastructure and convert ext4 to use it
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2017 14:25:11 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fuhqkti0.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170331192603.16442-1-jlayton@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2897 bytes --]

On Fri, Mar 31 2017, Jeff Layton wrote:

> During LSF/MM this year, we had a discussion about the current sorry
> state of writeback error reporting, and what could be done to improve
> the situation. This patchset represents a first pass at the proposal
> I made there.
>
> It first adds a new set of writeback error tracking infrastructure to
> ensure that errors are properly stored and reported at fsync time. It
> also makes a small but significant change to ensure that writeback
> errors are reported on all file descriptors, not just on the first one
> where fsync is called.
>
> Note that this is a _very_ rough draft at this point. I did some by-hand
> testing with dm-error to ensure that it does the right thing there.
> Mostly I'm interested in early feedback at this point -- does this basic
> approach make sense?

I think that having ->wb_err_seq and returning errors to all file
descriptors is a good idea.
I don't like ->wb_err, particularly that you allow it to be set
to zero:
 +	/*
 +	 * This should be called with the error code that we want to return
 +	 * on fsync. Thus, it should always be <= 0.
 +	 */
 +	WARN_ON(err > 0);

Why is that ??

Also I think that EIO should always over-ride ENOSPC as the possible
responses are different.  That probably means you need a separate seq
number for each, which isn't ideal.

I don't like that you need to add a 'flush' handler to every filesystem,
most of which just call
 +	return filemap_report_wb_error(file);

Could we just have
	if (filp->f_op->flush)
		retval = filp->f_op->flush(filp, id);
+	else
+		retval = filemap_report_wb_error(filp);
in flip_close() ??

... or maybe it is wrong to return this error on close().
After all, the file actually does get closed, so no error occurred.
If an application cares about EIO, it should always call fsync() before
close().

Thanks,
NeilBrown


>
> Jeff Layton (4):
>   fs: new infrastructure for writeback error handling and reporting
>   dax: set errors in mapping when writeback fails
>   buffer: set wb errors using both new and old infrastructure for now
>   ext4: wire it up to the new writeback error reporting infrastructure
>
>  Documentation/filesystems/vfs.txt | 14 +++++++--
>  fs/buffer.c                       |  6 +++-
>  fs/dax.c                          |  4 ++-
>  fs/ext4/dir.c                     |  1 +
>  fs/ext4/ext4.h                    |  1 +
>  fs/ext4/file.c                    |  1 +
>  fs/ext4/fsync.c                   | 15 +++++++---
>  fs/ext4/inode.c                   |  2 +-
>  fs/ext4/page-io.c                 |  4 +--
>  fs/open.c                         |  3 ++
>  include/linux/fs.h                |  5 ++++
>  mm/filemap.c                      | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  12 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> -- 
> 2.9.3

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-04-03  4:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-31 19:25 [RFC PATCH 0/4] fs: introduce new writeback error tracking infrastructure and convert ext4 to use it Jeff Layton
2017-03-31 19:26 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] fs: new infrastructure for writeback error handling and reporting Jeff Layton
2017-04-03  7:12   ` Nikolay Borisov
2017-04-03 10:28     ` Jeff Layton
2017-04-03 14:47   ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-04-03 15:19     ` Jeff Layton
2017-04-03 16:15       ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-04-03 16:30         ` Jeff Layton
2017-03-31 19:26 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] dax: set errors in mapping when writeback fails Jeff Layton
2017-03-31 19:26 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] buffer: set wb errors using both new and old infrastructure for now Jeff Layton
2017-03-31 19:26 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] ext4: wire it up to the new writeback error reporting infrastructure Jeff Layton
2017-04-03  4:25 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2017-04-03 10:28   ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] fs: introduce new writeback error tracking infrastructure and convert ext4 to use it Jeff Layton
2017-04-03 14:32     ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-04-03 17:47       ` Jeff Layton
2017-04-03 18:09         ` Jeremy Allison
2017-04-03 18:18           ` Jeff Layton
2017-04-03 18:36             ` Jeremy Allison
2017-04-03 18:40               ` Jeremy Allison
2017-04-03 18:49                 ` Jeff Layton
2017-04-03 19:16         ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-04-03 20:16           ` Jeff Layton
2017-04-04  2:45             ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-04-04  3:03             ` NeilBrown
2017-04-04 11:41               ` Jeff Layton
2017-04-04 22:41                 ` NeilBrown
2017-04-04 11:53               ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-04-04 12:17                 ` Jeff Layton
2017-04-04 16:12                   ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-04-04 16:25                     ` Jeff Layton
2017-04-04 17:09                       ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-04-04 18:08                         ` Jeff Layton
2017-04-04 22:50                         ` NeilBrown
2017-04-05 19:49                         ` Jeff Layton
2017-04-05 21:03                           ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-04-06  0:19                             ` NeilBrown
2017-04-06  0:02                           ` NeilBrown
2017-04-06  2:55                             ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-04-06  5:12                               ` NeilBrown
2017-04-06 13:31                                 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-04-06 21:53                                   ` NeilBrown
2017-04-06 14:02                             ` Jeff Layton
2017-04-06 19:14                             ` Jeff Layton
2017-04-06 20:05                               ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-04-07 13:12                                 ` Jeff Layton
2017-04-09 23:15                                   ` NeilBrown
2017-04-10 13:19                                     ` Jeff Layton
2017-04-06 22:15                               ` NeilBrown
2017-04-04 23:13                       ` NeilBrown
2017-04-05 11:14                         ` Jeff Layton
2017-04-06  0:24                           ` NeilBrown
2017-04-04 13:38                 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-04-04 22:28                 ` NeilBrown
2017-04-03 14:51   ` Matthew Wilcox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87fuhqkti0.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name \
    --to=neilb@suse.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).