From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] vfs: Detach mounts on unlink. Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 18:57:00 -0700 Message-ID: <87fvsgo4yb.fsf@xmission.com> References: <87a9kkax0j.fsf@xmission.com> <8761v7h2pt.fsf@tw-ebiederman.twitter.com> <87li281wx6.fsf_-_@xmission.com> <8761tctwhg.fsf@xmission.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Miklos Szeredi , "Serge E. Hallyn" , Al Viro , Linux-Fsdevel , Kernel Mailing List , Andy Lutomirski , Rob Landley To: Linus Torvalds Return-path: Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.232]:45826 "EHLO out02.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751257Ab3JEB5O (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Oct 2013 21:57:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: <8761tctwhg.fsf@xmission.com> (Eric W. Biederman's message of "Fri, 04 Oct 2013 17:03:23 -0700") Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) writes: > I just noticed that Al's latest vfs changes posted yesterday mean I need > to rebase and possibly respin these patches, as all of the locking and > interesting bits of the dcache have changed. I don't think the > conflicts would be fun to resolve during the merge window. On second look the only conflict is the rename of the vfsmount_lock to lock_mount_hash, and a few bits of context. So nothing interesting. Eric