From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] switch_creds: Syscall to switch creds for file server ops Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 20:52:58 -0700 Message-ID: <87hacgk0yt.fsf@xmission.com> References: <1381960919-4542-1-git-send-email-jlieb@panasas.com> <1381960919-4542-2-git-send-email-jlieb@panasas.com> <20131016224248.GQ13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <87ppr4lmp3.fsf@xmission.com> <20131017012050.GR13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Jim Lieb , tytso@mit.edu, viro@zeniv.linux.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bfields@redhat.com, jlayton@redhat.com To: Al Viro Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20131017012050.GR13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (Al Viro's message of "Thu, 17 Oct 2013 02:20:50 +0100") Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Al Viro writes: > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 06:18:16PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > >> That doesn't look bad but it does need capable(CAP_SETUID) && >> capable(CAP_SETGID) or possibly something a little more refined. > > D'oh > >> I don't think we want file descriptor passing to all of a sudden become >> a grant of privilege, beyond what the passed fd can do. > > Definitely. And an extra ) to make it compile wouldn't hurt either... There also appears to need to be a check that we don't gain any capabilities. We also need a check so that you don't gain any capabilities, and possibly a few other things. So I suspect we want a check something like: if ((new_cred->securebits != current_cred->securebits) || (new_cred->cap_inheritable != current_cred->cap_inheritable) || (new_cred->cap_permitted != current_cred->cap_permitted) || (new_cred->cap_effective != current_cred->cap_effective) || (new_cred->cap_bset != current_cred->cap_bset) || (new_cred->jit_keyring != current_cred->jit_keyring) || (new_cred->session_keyring != current_cred->session_keyring) || (new_cred->process_keyring != current_cred->process_keyring) || (new_cred->thread_keyring != current_cred->thread_keyring) || (new_cred->request_keyring != current_cred->request_keyring) || (new_cred->security != current_cred->security) || (new_cred->user_ns != current_cred->user_ns)) { return -EPERM; } Eric