Re: [PATCH man-pages] open.2: improve O_PATH documentation.

[NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1836 bytes --]

On Thu, Aug 10 2017, Krzysztof Błaszkowski wrote:

> Mr Poettering,
>
>
> I don't know exactly what is the whole discussion about but Mr
> consider (very seriously) this regarding C language, C coding,
> compilers and program execution:
>
> claim #1: "==" is compare operator another words result is considered
> to be true if both arguments are same binary
>
> claim #2: it is possible to compare different types to each other, e.g.
> int to char, long long to short
>
> claim #3: if both arguments are of different sizes then compiler
> extends shorter type to the size of larger argument padding with 0s.
>
> claim #4: compiler uses type of variable for immediate constant when
> comparing the variable to it. thus even bitfields comparisons work.
>
> claim #5: the compiler is modern gcc
>
> thus your whole thesis is damn crap especially your claim like "Linux
> is broken". you could write glibc is broken because it does not
> "expose" (which is not strictly true) the fsword_t 
>
> Do you know what the term "Linux" stands for ?
> I can give you explanation but there are so many other noble developers
> which can do this better and it is disappointing that they haven't done
> this yet.
>
>
> I could ignore your email like others did but once upon I gave you a
> proof that because systemd-logging can't do better recovery than
> underlying file system then doing so by systemd-logging is utterly
> stupid, so if you, Mr Poettering, stop doing more userspace crap then
> whole "Linux" will only benefit from this.
>
>
> And the Red Hat should fire you out.
> I reckon that fools are the worst plague in the World and that's why I
> stopped tolerating fools.
> I am a racist - I hate fools.

Please keep the discussion civil.  This sort of language is not welcome.

NeilBrown

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]