From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: mtk.manpages@gmail.com
Cc: systemd-devel@freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH manpages] umount.2: revise MNT_FORCE description.
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2017 15:49:58 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mv7asj5l.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1646 bytes --]
MNT_FORCE does not allow a busy filesystem to be unmounted. Only
MNT_DETACH allows that.
MNT_FORCE only tries to abort pending transactions, in the hope that
might help umount not to block,
Also, other filesystems than NFS support MNT_FORCE.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
---
Explanation derived from examination of source code.
Cc to systemd devel in relation to comment I just posted:
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/0c08f5cde749bd2818475e487109cd0d413452df
You may want to move the "linux version when support was added" to a
comment, or discard it.
man2/umount.2 | 14 +++++++++++---
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/man2/umount.2 b/man2/umount.2
index 68f76b7c6352..ccd1d07afe88 100644
--- a/man2/umount.2
+++ b/man2/umount.2
@@ -61,9 +61,17 @@ unmounts a target, but allows additional
controlling the behavior of the operation:
.TP
.BR MNT_FORCE " (since Linux 2.1.116)"
-Force unmount even if busy.
-This can cause data loss.
-(Only for NFS mounts.)
+Ask the filesystem to abort pending requests before attempting the
+unmount. This may allow the unmount to complete without waiting
+for an inaccessible server. If, after aborting requests, some
+processes still have active references to the filesystem, the
+unmount will still fail. In Linux 4.12, only the filesystems
+9p (2.6.16),
+ceph (2.6.34),
+cifs (2.6.12),
+fuse (2.6.16),
+lustre (3.11),
+and NFS (2.1.116) respond to MNT_FORCE.
.TP
.BR MNT_DETACH " (since Linux 2.4.11)"
Perform a lazy unmount: make the mount point unavailable for new
--
2.14.0.rc0.dirty
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2017-08-08 5:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-08 5:49 NeilBrown [this message]
2017-08-08 19:26 ` [PATCH manpages] umount.2: revise MNT_FORCE description Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2017-08-10 3:23 ` [PATCH manpages] umount.2: restore mention of data loss with MNT_FORCE NeilBrown
2017-08-12 20:07 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87mv7asj5l.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name \
--to=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=systemd-devel@freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).