From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [patch 1/4] fs: cleanup files_lock Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 16:39:20 +0200 Message-ID: <87mxvax3on.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> References: <20100604064307.737085373@suse.de> <20100604072618.227745945@suse.de> <20100604083818.GA9987@infradead.org> <20100604142052.GD26335@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Al Viro , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Frank Mayhar , John Stultz , Andi Kleen , Alan Cox , "Eric W. Biederman" , Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Nick Piggin Return-path: Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:59724 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932293Ab0FDOj0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jun 2010 10:39:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100604142052.GD26335@laptop> (Nick Piggin's message of "Sat\, 5 Jun 2010 00\:20\:52 +1000") Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Nick Piggin writes: > > Again, this would be nice, but I didn't see an easy way to do it. > Even if refcounting obsoleted may_remount_ro, we still have > mark_files_ro. It's no more complex to rip this all out after my > patch. I don't see the problem in doing this patch. It has good > numbers. Yes agreed. The global lock is currently really painful on workloads that do a lot of opens and anything to make this better would be good asap. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.