From: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
amwang@redhat.com, eparis@redhat.com, esandeen@redhat.com,
eteo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch 12/12] vfs: allow file truncations when both suid and write permissions set
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2009 11:32:52 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ocqs2w17.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200908062310.n76NAIEo013014@imap1.linux-foundation.org> (akpm@linux-foundation.org's message of "Thu, 06 Aug 2009 16:10:18 -0700")
akpm@linux-foundation.org writes:
> diff -puN fs/open.c~vfs-allow-file-truncations-when-both-suid-and-write-permissions-set fs/open.c
> --- a/fs/open.c~vfs-allow-file-truncations-when-both-suid-and-write-permissions-set
> +++ a/fs/open.c
> @@ -213,11 +213,15 @@ int do_truncate(struct dentry *dentry, l
> newattrs.ia_valid |= ATTR_FILE;
> }
>
> + mutex_lock(&dentry->d_inode->i_mutex);
> /* Remove suid/sgid on truncate too */
> - newattrs.ia_valid |= should_remove_suid(dentry);
> + err = dentry_remove_suid(dentry);
> + if (err)
> + goto unlock;
Can't we use ATTR_FORCE for this? Because this calls notify_change()
twice, and I guess this removes s[ug]id even if vmtruncate() (or in
future ->truncate() may return error) or something returned error.
I think it would not be good behavior.
Thanks.
> - mutex_lock(&dentry->d_inode->i_mutex);
> err = notify_change(dentry, &newattrs);
> +
> + unlock:
> mutex_unlock(&dentry->d_inode->i_mutex);
> return err;
> }
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-07 2:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-06 23:10 [patch 12/12] vfs: allow file truncations when both suid and write permissions set akpm
2009-08-07 2:32 ` OGAWA Hirofumi [this message]
2009-08-07 3:21 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-07 4:17 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-08-07 5:49 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-08-07 9:20 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-07 11:06 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-08-07 9:27 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-07 11:02 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-08-07 11:25 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-08-10 2:00 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-10 4:34 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ocqs2w17.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp \
--to=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=amwang@redhat.com \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=esandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=eteo@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox