From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A198638F96 for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 22:20:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.b="vBRHjWs+"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.b="933tbh9j" Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [IPv6:2001:67c:2178:6::1c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29DC910C3; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 15:20:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23F4521C7F; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 22:20:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1698186021; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=CDeMMzqwERdWZxhGUFthQI91/gdqCAMKlu74LJU3/pc=; b=vBRHjWs+sgfl44CHFZ67PsaMWBbaUhtaEl5ETVD8Y0K0pcxZYwDcyKDSfVQ+0AXfiwf7pX tysZQkyaSTF165wNCkKoDUQBOtlPwXih0BBfQtH07RNP67rRqBicWF1gZnzlWiC5ftYa0z BGq4v9yZKpo3MpVDdjtrgn+w8gH7ox0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1698186021; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=CDeMMzqwERdWZxhGUFthQI91/gdqCAMKlu74LJU3/pc=; b=933tbh9jJpH40D8bAgtuwIP3Oz7cqUkB+n7n5/w3vxtF14VC633YCAUySmXy/JoYWnrKhe 85Ty07IujwoJWGBg== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E23631391C; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 22:20:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id 4vKlMSRDOGXYBgAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Tue, 24 Oct 2023 22:20:20 +0000 From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi To: Christian Brauner Cc: Eric Biggers , viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, tytso@mit.edu, jaegeuk@kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/9] Support negative dentries on case-insensitive ext4 and f2fs In-Reply-To: <20230822-denkmal-operette-f16d8bd815fc@brauner> (Christian Brauner's message of "Tue, 22 Aug 2023 11:03:48 +0200") Organization: SUSE References: <20230816050803.15660-1-krisman@suse.de> <20230817170658.GD1483@sol.localdomain> <20230821-derart-serienweise-3506611e576d@brauner> <871qfwns61.fsf@suse.de> <20230822-denkmal-operette-f16d8bd815fc@brauner> Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 18:20:19 -0400 Message-ID: <87pm138xy4.fsf@> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; none X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Score: -3.78 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.78 / 50.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-3.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.de:s=susede2_rsa,suse.de:s=susede2_ed25519]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[8]; INVALID_MSGID(1.70)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-1.88)[94.35%] Christian Brauner writes: >> Targeting 6.7 is fine by me. will you pick it up through the vfs tree? I >> prefer it goes through there since it mostly touches vfs. > > Yes, I think that's what will end up happening. Hi Christian, Sorry for the ping again, but I got a question about your process. I noticed this patchset did not make into linux-next in preparation for the 6.7 merge request. It also doesn't show in your vfs.all, but an older iteration (definitely not the v6 that Eric acked) exists in a vfs.dcache.casefold branch. Is this expected and I'm missing something? I considered this applied but I might have misunderstood. Please let me know if you need me to rebase. -- Gabriel Krisman Bertazi