linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	 Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>,
	 Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	 Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	 Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	 Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	 Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,  Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	 Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	 Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	 Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,  Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	 Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,  Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
	 Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,  linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,  linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,  libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 02/10] sched_getattr: port to copy_struct_to_user
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 10:51:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r04xdd93.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b66580447aa94593136186a4046fd350e598943a.camel@xry111.site> (Xi Ruoyao's message of "Mon, 20 Jan 2025 17:21:08 +0800")

* Xi Ruoyao:

>> > So should we drop the test before Glibc-2.41 release?  I'm seeing the
>> > failure during my machine test.
>> I was waiting for a verdict from the kernel developers.  I didn't expect
>> such a change to happen given the alleged UAPI policy.
>
> But 6.13 is already released without reverting the behavior change
> now...  So is this the "final" verdict?

I had originally missed the Linux 6.13 release.  I've submitted a glibc
patch:

  [PATCH] Linux: Do not check unused bytes after sched_getattr in
  tst-sched_setattr
  <https://inbox.sourceware.org/libc-alpha/87v7u9ddas.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com/>

Thanks,
Florian


  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-20  9:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-09 20:40 [PATCH RFC v3 00/10] extensible syscalls: CHECK_FIELDS to allow for easier feature detection Aleksa Sarai
2024-10-09 20:40 ` [PATCH RFC v3 01/10] uaccess: add copy_struct_to_user helper Aleksa Sarai
2024-10-09 20:40 ` [PATCH RFC v3 02/10] sched_getattr: port to copy_struct_to_user Aleksa Sarai
2024-12-10 18:14   ` Florian Weimer
2024-12-11 10:23     ` Christian Brauner
2025-01-18 13:02       ` Xi Ruoyao
2025-01-20  5:28         ` Florian Weimer
2025-01-20  9:21           ` Xi Ruoyao
2025-01-20  9:51             ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2024-10-09 20:40 ` [PATCH RFC v3 03/10] openat2: explicitly return -E2BIG for (usize > PAGE_SIZE) Aleksa Sarai
2024-10-10  6:24   ` Greg KH
2024-10-10 10:09   ` (subset) " Christian Brauner
2024-10-09 20:40 ` [PATCH RFC v3 04/10] openat2: add CHECK_FIELDS flag to usize argument Aleksa Sarai
2024-10-09 20:40 ` [PATCH RFC v3 05/10] selftests: openat2: add 0xFF poisoned data after misaligned struct Aleksa Sarai
2024-10-09 20:40 ` [PATCH RFC v3 06/10] selftests: openat2: add CHECK_FIELDS selftests Aleksa Sarai
2024-10-09 20:40 ` [PATCH RFC v3 07/10] clone3: add CHECK_FIELDS flag to usize argument Aleksa Sarai
2024-10-09 20:40 ` [PATCH RFC v3 08/10] selftests: clone3: add CHECK_FIELDS selftests Aleksa Sarai
2024-10-09 20:40 ` [PATCH RFC v3 09/10] mount_setattr: add CHECK_FIELDS flag to usize argument Aleksa Sarai
2024-10-09 20:40 ` [PATCH RFC v3 10/10] selftests: mount_setattr: add CHECK_FIELDS selftest Aleksa Sarai
2024-10-10  6:26 ` [PATCH RFC v3 00/10] extensible syscalls: CHECK_FIELDS to allow for easier feature detection Florian Weimer
2024-10-21 14:51 ` (subset) " Christian Brauner
2024-10-21 21:38   ` Aleksa Sarai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87r04xdd93.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com \
    --to=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=cyphar@cyphar.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=xry111@xry111.site \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).