Linux filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luis Henriques <luis@igalia.com>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	 Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
	 linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, fuse-devel@lists.linux.dev,
	 Chen Linxuan <chenlinxuan@uniontech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] selftests/fuse: add ACL_DONT_CACHE regression test
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 13:45:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87se5j85n2.fsf@wotan.olymp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOQ4uxjakizfBuTYUG-=K+L1MUfaCkwtKUyNh2g_9K2c4u3-Ng@mail.gmail.com> (Amir Goldstein's message of "Thu, 16 Jul 2026 12:10:35 +0200")

On Thu, Jul 16 2026, Amir Goldstein wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 15, 2026 at 10:41 PM Luis Henriques <luis@igalia.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 15 2026, Amir Goldstein wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>> >> A question: in my own tests I have been following a different approach,
>> >> where the filesystem is mounted from a shell script that does the actual
>> >> testing.  I wonder if you think your approach (i.e. writing the actual
>> >> test in C, using the kselftest macros) is the preferred one.
>> >
>> > I always prefer a standalone C program for a selftest.
>> > For fstests naturally the tests are done by the shell scripts,
>> > so it really depends.
>>
>> Cool, thanks.  I'll consider adapting my own tests to have a similar
>> format as this one.
>>
>> >> Anyway, the test looks good to me, and I just have a few minor comments
>> >> below.
>> >>
>> >> > fuse_acl_cache_test is only built when libfuse3 is detected via
>> >> > pkg-config.
>> >>
>> >> Yeah, I've sent a patch recently converting the only existing test to also
>> >> user fuse3 instead.  Not sure that's acceptable though, since there's a
>> >> chance of breaking some CI.
>> >
>> > I mean if the test is not built it wont run, so I don't know why CI would fail.
>> > Obviously some systems do not have libfuse. That's fine by me
>> > not everyone needs to run all the tests.
>>
>> Oh! as usual my comment wasn't clear :-)
>>
>> In fact, my comment wasn't really very relevant in the context of this
>> patch as, in my opinion, I think it's OK for new tests to depend on fuse3.
>>
>> I was talking about my own patch[1] which was converting the existing
>> test, which depends on fuse2, to use fuse3.  That's what I was referring
>> to when talking about breaking CI: we could have a scenario where a test
>> was being built and executed and, because it's now using fuse3, it can't
>> be built any more.
>>
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260708131122.2917-3-luis@igalia.com/
>>
>
> CC test author
> I think your concern is exaggerated
> This test is 1 year old. Who runs this test and doesn't have fuse3?
>
> Also, when speaking of regressions, test suites are usually the last of
> concerns - they always regularly break after kernel changes, because
> of "over expectations".
>
> Test suit runners usually keep the test suite uptodate.
>
> They are almost never deployed binary rpm packages where kernel
> regressions cause a problem.
>
> And also, it's not critical, so you can always try and see if someone shouts
> (and then you can also shout back).

OK, understood.  And I agree, of course (otherwise, why would I send the
patch to convert it to fuse3? :-)

Also, I'll make sure I'll CC the test author in next rev (I don't think I
did included him in v1).  And thank you, Amir!

Cheers,
-- 
Luís

>> > Thanks for the review!
>>
>> I had two extra comments below, not sure you saw them ;-)
>
> I did not :)
>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> --
>> Luís
>>
>> > Amir.
>> >
>> >>
>> >> > Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
>> >> > ---
>> >> >  .../selftests/filesystems/fuse/Makefile       |  10 +
>> >> >  .../filesystems/fuse/fuse_acl_cache_test.c    | 348 ++++++++++++++++++
>> >> >  2 files changed, 358 insertions(+)
>> >> >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/fuse/fuse_acl_cache_test.c
>> >> >
>> >> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/fuse/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/fuse/Makefile
>> >> > index 612aad69a93aa..f471414842750 100644
>> >> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/fuse/Makefile
>> >> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/fuse/Makefile
>> >> > @@ -5,6 +5,13 @@ CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 -g $(KHDR_INCLUDES)
>> >> >  TEST_GEN_PROGS := fusectl_test
>> >> >  TEST_GEN_FILES := fuse_mnt
>> >> >
>> >> > +# fuse_acl_cache_test requires libfuse3; add it only when the library is present.
>> >> > +ACL_CFLAGS := $(shell pkg-config fuse3 --cflags 2>/dev/null)
>> >> > +ACL_LDLIBS := $(shell pkg-config fuse3 --libs 2>/dev/null)
>> >> > +ifneq ($(ACL_CFLAGS),)
>> >> > +TEST_GEN_PROGS += fuse_acl_cache_test
>> >> > +endif
>> >> > +
>> >> >  include ../../lib.mk
>> >> >
>> >> >  VAR_CFLAGS := $(shell pkg-config fuse --cflags 2>/dev/null)
>> >> > @@ -19,3 +26,6 @@ endif
>> >> >
>> >> >  $(OUTPUT)/fuse_mnt: CFLAGS += $(VAR_CFLAGS)
>> >> >  $(OUTPUT)/fuse_mnt: LDLIBS += $(VAR_LDLIBS)
>> >> > +
>> >> > +$(OUTPUT)/fuse_acl_cache_test: CFLAGS += $(ACL_CFLAGS)
>> >> > +$(OUTPUT)/fuse_acl_cache_test: LDLIBS += $(ACL_LDLIBS)
>> >> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/fuse/fuse_acl_cache_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/fuse/fuse_acl_cache_test.c
>> >> > new file mode 100644
>> >> > index 0000000000000..b2e5db8555040
>> >> > --- /dev/null
>> >> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/fuse/fuse_acl_cache_test.c
>> >> > @@ -0,0 +1,348 @@
>> >> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> >> > +/*
>> >> > + * Test: FUSE ACL caching bug triggered by AT_STATX_FORCE_SYNC
>> >> > + *
>> >> > + * A FUSE mount that does not negotiate FUSE_POSIX_ACL initialises every inode
>> >> > + * with i_acl = i_default_acl = ACL_DONT_CACHE.  When a fresh stat is needed
>> >> > + * (e.g. AT_STATX_FORCE_SYNC), fuse_update_get_attr() calls
>> >> > + * forget_all_cached_acls() before issuing FUSE_GETATTR.  On an unfixed kernel,
>> >> > + * __forget_cached_acl() replaces ACL_DONT_CACHE with ACL_NOT_CACHED,
>> >> > + * inadvertently enabling the kernel ACL cache for that inode.  The next
>> >> > + * getxattr populates the cache.  Because fuse_set_acl() skips
>> >> > + * forget_all_cached_acls() for !fc->posix_acl mounts, any subsequent change to
>> >> > + * the ACL leaves the stale kernel entry in place, and the next getxattr returns
>> >> > + * wrong data without ever reaching the FUSE daemon.
>> >> > + *
>> >> > + * Fix (fs/posix_acl.c): __forget_cached_acl() returns early when *p is
>> >> > + * ACL_DONT_CACHE, preserving the "never cache" invariant for the inode's
>> >> > + * lifetime.
>> >> > + *
>> >> > + * Test outline:
>> >> > + *  1. Mount a minimal FUSE fs (no FUSE_POSIX_ACL negotiated).
>> >> > + *  2. lgetxattr -> daemon called, ACL_A returned, NOT cached (ACL_DONT_CACHE).
>> >> > + *  3. statx(AT_STATX_FORCE_SYNC) -> forget_all_cached_acls() called.
>> >> > + *     Buggy:  ACL_DONT_CACHE -> ACL_NOT_CACHED (cache enabled).
>> >> > + *     Fixed:  ACL_DONT_CACHE preserved.
>> >> > + *  4. lgetxattr -> daemon called, ACL_A returned.
>> >> > + *     Buggy:  result now cached (ACL_NOT_CACHED -> cached).
>> >> > + *     Fixed:  result still not cached.
>> >> > + *  5. Daemon switches to ACL_B internally (different size).
>> >> > + *  6. lgetxattr -> should return ACL_B (44 bytes).
>> >> > + *     Buggy:  cache hit, returns stale ACL_A (28 bytes). FAIL.
>> >> > + *     Fixed:  no cache, daemon called, returns ACL_B (44 bytes). PASS.
>> >> > + */
>> >> > +
>> >> > +#define _GNU_SOURCE
>> >> > +#include <errno.h>
>> >> > +#include <fcntl.h>
>> >> > +#include <linux/limits.h>
>> >> > +#include <pthread.h>
>> >> > +#include <stdint.h>
>> >> > +#include <stdio.h>
>> >> > +#include <stdlib.h>
>> >> > +#include <string.h>
>> >> > +#include <sys/stat.h>
>> >> > +#include <sys/syscall.h>
>> >> > +#include <sys/xattr.h>
>> >> > +#include <unistd.h>
>> >> > +
>> >> > +#define FUSE_USE_VERSION 31
>> >> > +#include <fuse_lowlevel.h>
>> >> > +
>> >> > +#include "kselftest_harness.h"
>> >> > +
>> >> > +/* ---- ACL binary encoding ------------------------------------------------ */
>> >> > +/*
>> >> > + * POSIX ACL v2 xattr format (little-endian):
>> >> > + *   header: u32 version (= 0x00000002)
>> >> > + *   entry:  u16 tag | u16 perm | u32 id
>> >> > + *
>> >> > + * Entries must appear in tag-ascending order; named USER/GROUP entries
>> >> > + * require a MASK entry.  Both ACLs pass posix_acl_from_xattr() validation.
>> >> > + */
>> >> > +
>> >> > +/* ACL_A: 3 entries (USER_OBJ:rwx, GROUP_OBJ:r-x, OTHER:r-x) = 28 bytes */
>> >> > +static const uint8_t acl_a[] = {
>> >> > +     0x02, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,                         /* v2 header      */
>> >> > +     0x01, 0x00, 0x07, 0x00, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, /* USER_OBJ  rwx  */
>> >> > +     0x04, 0x00, 0x05, 0x00, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, /* GROUP_OBJ r-x  */
>> >> > +     0x20, 0x00, 0x05, 0x00, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, /* OTHER     r-x  */
>> >> > +};
>> >>
>> >> Wouldn't it be OK to add a dependency on libacl to make this more
>> >> readable?
>> >>
>
> It would be ok, but TBH, the only fact relevant to this test is that
> acl_a and acl_b
> are different. That is pretty easy to understand even without libacl...
>
>> >> >
>> >> > +
>> >> > +/*
>> >> > + * ACL_B: 5 entries — adds USER uid=1 and MASK = 44 bytes.
>> >> > + * A named USER entry requires a MASK; all tags in ascending order.
>> >> > + */
>> >> > +static const uint8_t acl_b[] = {
>> >> > +     0x02, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,                         /* v2 header       */
>> >> > +     0x01, 0x00, 0x07, 0x00, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, /* USER_OBJ   rwx  */
>> >> > +     0x02, 0x00, 0x07, 0x00, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, /* USER uid=1 rwx  */
>> >> > +     0x04, 0x00, 0x05, 0x00, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, /* GROUP_OBJ  r-x  */
>> >> > +     0x10, 0x00, 0x07, 0x00, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, /* MASK       rwx  */
>> >> > +     0x20, 0x00, 0x05, 0x00, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, /* OTHER      r-x  */
>> >> > +};
>> >> > +
>> >> > +/* ---- Shared state (daemon thread <-> test thread) ----------------------- */
>> >> > +
>> >> > +#define FILE_INO  2
>> >> > +#define FILE_NAME "testfile"
>> >> > +
>> >> > +struct daemon_state {
>> >> > +     pthread_mutex_t lock;
>> >> > +     const uint8_t  *acl;
>> >> > +     size_t          acl_size;
>> >> > +     int             getxattr_count;
>> >> > +};
>> >> > +
>> >> > +/*
>> >> > + * Global: callbacks are stateless fns so we use a single global.
>> >> > + * Safe because only one test instance runs at a time.
>> >> > + */
>> >> > +static struct daemon_state g_ds = {
>> >> > +     .lock = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER,
>> >> > +};
>> >> > +
>> >> > +/* ---- FUSE lowlevel callbacks -------------------------------------------- */
>> >> > +
>> >> > +static void fs_lookup(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t parent, const char *name)
>> >> > +{
>> >> > +     if (parent != FUSE_ROOT_ID || strcmp(name, FILE_NAME)) {
>> >> > +             fuse_reply_err(req, ENOENT);
>> >> > +             return;
>> >> > +     }
>> >> > +     struct fuse_entry_param e = {};
>> >> > +
>> >> > +     /*
>> >> > +      * Long attr/entry timeouts so that normal stat() calls do not
>> >> > +      * expire and trigger forget_all_cached_acls() on their own;
>> >> > +      * only the explicit AT_STATX_FORCE_SYNC should trigger it.
>> >> > +      */
>> >> > +     e.ino             = FILE_INO;
>> >> > +     e.generation      = 1;
>> >> > +     e.attr_timeout    = 10.0;
>> >> > +     e.entry_timeout   = 10.0;
>> >> > +     e.attr.st_ino     = FILE_INO;
>> >> > +     e.attr.st_mode    = S_IFREG | 0644;
>> >> > +     e.attr.st_nlink   = 1;
>> >> > +     fuse_reply_entry(req, &e);
>> >> > +}
>> >> > +
>> >> > +static void fs_getattr(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino,
>> >> > +                    struct fuse_file_info *fi)
>> >> > +{
>> >> > +     struct stat st = {};
>> >> > +
>> >> > +     (void)fi;
>> >> > +     if (ino == FUSE_ROOT_ID) {
>> >> > +             st.st_ino   = FUSE_ROOT_ID;
>> >> > +             st.st_mode  = S_IFDIR | 0755;
>> >> > +             st.st_nlink = 2;
>> >> > +     } else if (ino == FILE_INO) {
>> >> > +             st.st_ino   = FILE_INO;
>> >> > +             st.st_mode  = S_IFREG | 0644;
>> >> > +             st.st_nlink = 1;
>> >> > +     } else {
>> >> > +             fuse_reply_err(req, ENOENT);
>> >> > +             return;
>> >> > +     }
>> >> > +     fuse_reply_attr(req, &st, 10);
>> >> > +}
>> >> > +
>> >> > +static void fs_getxattr(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t ino, const char *name,
>> >> > +                     size_t size)
>> >> > +{
>> >> > +     if (ino != FILE_INO ||
>> >> > +         strcmp(name, "system.posix_acl_access") != 0) {
>> >> > +             fuse_reply_err(req, ENODATA);
>> >> > +             return;
>> >> > +     }
>> >> > +
>> >> > +     pthread_mutex_lock(&g_ds.lock);
>> >> > +     const uint8_t *acl      = g_ds.acl;
>> >> > +     size_t         acl_size = g_ds.acl_size;
>> >> > +     g_ds.getxattr_count++;
>> >> > +     pthread_mutex_unlock(&g_ds.lock);
>> >> > +
>> >> > +     if (size == 0)
>> >> > +             fuse_reply_xattr(req, acl_size);
>> >> > +     else if (size < acl_size)
>> >> > +             fuse_reply_err(req, ERANGE);
>> >> > +     else
>> >> > +             fuse_reply_buf(req, (const char *)acl, acl_size);
>> >> > +}
>> >> > +
>> >> > +static const struct fuse_lowlevel_ops fs_ops = {
>> >> > +     .lookup   = fs_lookup,
>> >> > +     .getattr  = fs_getattr,
>> >> > +     .getxattr = fs_getxattr,
>> >> > +};
>> >> > +
>> >> > +/* ---- Daemon thread ------------------------------------------------------- */
>> >> > +
>> >> > +static void *run_daemon(void *arg)
>> >> > +{
>> >> > +     fuse_session_loop((struct fuse_session *)arg);
>> >> > +     return NULL;
>> >> > +}
>> >> > +
>> >> > +/* ---- kselftest harness --------------------------------------------------- */
>> >> > +
>> >> > +FIXTURE(acl_cache) {
>> >> > +     struct fuse_session *se;
>> >> > +     char                 mountpoint[PATH_MAX];
>> >> > +     char                 file_path[PATH_MAX];
>> >> > +     pthread_t            thread;
>> >> > +};
>> >> > +
>> >> > +FIXTURE_SETUP(acl_cache)
>> >> > +{
>> >> > +     char *fuse_argv[] = { "fuse_acl_cache_test", NULL };
>> >> > +     struct fuse_args args = FUSE_ARGS_INIT(1, fuse_argv);
>> >> > +
>> >> > +     g_ds.acl            = acl_a;
>> >> > +     g_ds.acl_size       = sizeof(acl_a);
>> >> > +     g_ds.getxattr_count = 0;
>> >> > +
>> >> > +     strcpy(self->mountpoint, "/tmp/acl_cache_test_XXXXXX");
>> >> > +     if (!mkdtemp(self->mountpoint))
>> >> > +             SKIP(return, "mkdtemp: %s", strerror(errno));
>> >> > +
>> >> > +     snprintf(self->file_path, sizeof(self->file_path),
>> >> > +              "%s/" FILE_NAME, self->mountpoint);
>> >> > +
>> >> > +     self->se = fuse_session_new(&args, &fs_ops, sizeof(fs_ops), NULL);
>> >> > +     if (!self->se) {
>> >> > +             rmdir(self->mountpoint);
>> >> > +             SKIP(return, "fuse_session_new failed");
>> >> > +     }
>> >> > +
>> >> > +     if (fuse_session_mount(self->se, self->mountpoint)) {
>> >> > +             fuse_session_destroy(self->se);
>> >> > +             rmdir(self->mountpoint);
>> >> > +             SKIP(return, "fuse_session_mount failed "
>> >> > +                          "(missing fusermount3 or insufficient privileges)");
>> >> > +     }
>> >> > +
>> >> > +     if (pthread_create(&self->thread, NULL, run_daemon, self->se)) {
>> >> > +             fuse_session_unmount(self->se);
>> >> > +             fuse_session_destroy(self->se);
>> >> > +             rmdir(self->mountpoint);
>> >> > +             SKIP(return, "pthread_create: %s", strerror(errno));
>> >> > +     }
>> >> > +
>> >> > +     fuse_opt_free_args(&args);
>> >> > +}
>> >> > +
>> >> > +FIXTURE_TEARDOWN(acl_cache)
>> >> > +{
>> >> > +     fuse_session_exit(self->se);
>> >> > +     fuse_session_unmount(self->se);
>> >> > +     pthread_join(self->thread, NULL);
>> >> > +     fuse_session_destroy(self->se);
>> >> > +     rmdir(self->mountpoint);
>> >> > +}
>> >> > +
>> >> > +static int do_force_statx(const char *path)
>> >> > +{
>> >> > +     struct statx stx;
>> >> > +
>> >> > +     return syscall(SYS_statx, AT_FDCWD, path,
>> >> > +                    AT_STATX_FORCE_SYNC, STATX_BASIC_STATS, &stx);
>> >> > +}
>> >> > +
>> >> > +TEST_F(acl_cache, stale_after_force_sync)
>> >> > +{
>> >> > +     char    buf[512];
>> >> > +     ssize_t sz;
>> >> > +     int     count;
>> >> > +
>> >> > +     /*
>> >> > +      * Step 1: two getxattr calls before any statx(FORCE_SYNC).
>> >> > +      * i_acl == ACL_DONT_CACHE.  __get_acl's cmpxchg(p, ACL_NOT_CACHED,
>> >> > +      * sentinel) finds *p != ACL_NOT_CACHED on every call, so the sentinel
>> >> > +      * is never placed and the result is never cached.  Both calls must
>> >> > +      * reach the daemon, proving ACL_DONT_CACHE suppresses caching.
>> >> > +      */
>> >> > +     sz = lgetxattr(self->file_path, "system.posix_acl_access",
>> >> > +                    buf, sizeof(buf));
>> >> > +     ASSERT_EQ(sz, (ssize_t)sizeof(acl_a));
>> >> > +
>> >> > +     sz = lgetxattr(self->file_path, "system.posix_acl_access",
>> >> > +                    buf, sizeof(buf));
>> >> > +     ASSERT_EQ(sz, (ssize_t)sizeof(acl_a));
>> >> > +
>> >> > +     pthread_mutex_lock(&g_ds.lock);
>> >> > +     count = g_ds.getxattr_count;
>> >> > +     pthread_mutex_unlock(&g_ds.lock);
>> >> > +
>> >> > +     ASSERT_EQ(count, 2);
>> >> > +     TH_LOG("step 1 OK: both pre-trigger getxattrs reached daemon (count=%d), "
>> >> > +            "ACL_DONT_CACHE is working", count);
>> >> > +
>> >> > +     /*
>> >> > +      * Step 2: statx(AT_STATX_FORCE_SYNC).
>> >> > +      * fuse_update_get_attr() calls forget_all_cached_acls() before sending
>> >> > +      * FUSE_GETATTR.
>> >> > +      *   Buggy kernel:  ACL_DONT_CACHE -> ACL_NOT_CACHED  (cache enabled)
>> >> > +      *   Fixed kernel:  ACL_DONT_CACHE preserved           (no effect)
>> >> > +      */
>> >> > +     ASSERT_EQ(do_force_statx(self->file_path), 0);
>> >>
>> >> Why not calling statx(2) instead?  Are you using a libc that doesn't
>> >> include a wrapper?
>
> No reason. Will change to statx()
>
>> >>
>> >> (Also, I wonder if having the global state protected with a mutex is
>> >> really needed in the scope of this test... but yeah, that's the correct
>> >> thing to do, of course.)
>
> When writing a test I try to optimize for code clarity and development speed
> nothing else.
>
> Obviously I assist agents when writing tests - would be stupid not to,
> so when I review I stick to validating correctness and readability.
>
> That's the true reason for syscall(SYS_statx,
> I was something correct, I didn't bother to fix it, but your
> comment was in place.
>
> Thanks for the review.
> Amir.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-16 12:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-13 22:09 [PATCH 0/2] Fix for unintended FUSE ACL cache Amir Goldstein
2026-07-13 22:09 ` [PATCH 1/2] fs: preserve ACL_DONT_CACHE state in forget_cached_acl() Amir Goldstein
2026-07-15  9:02   ` Christian Brauner
2026-07-15  9:40     ` Amir Goldstein
2026-07-15 15:43   ` Luis Henriques
2026-07-13 22:09 ` [PATCH 2/2] selftests/fuse: add ACL_DONT_CACHE regression test Amir Goldstein
2026-07-15 16:01   ` Luis Henriques
2026-07-15 17:38     ` Amir Goldstein
2026-07-15 20:42       ` Luis Henriques
2026-07-16 10:10         ` Amir Goldstein
2026-07-16 11:24           ` Chen Linxuan
2026-07-16 12:49             ` Luis Henriques
2026-07-16 12:45           ` Luis Henriques [this message]
2026-07-16 10:12   ` Amir Goldstein

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87se5j85n2.fsf@wotan.olymp \
    --to=luis@igalia.com \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=chenlinxuan@uniontech.com \
    --cc=fuse-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox