From: Chandan Babu R <chandanbabu@kernel.org>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
brauner@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz
Subject: Re: [BUG REPORT] shrink_dcache_parent() loops indefinitely on a next-20240102 kernel
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2024 18:40:43 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sf3d8c0u.fsf@debian-BULLSEYE-live-builder-AMD64> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240104043420.GT361584@frogsfrogsfrogs>
On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 08:34:20 PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 12:12:12PM +0530, Chandan Babu R wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Executing fstests' recoveryloop test group on XFS on a next-20240102 kernel
>> sometimes causes the following hung task report to be printed on the console,
>>
>> [ 190.284008] XFS (loop5): Mounting V5 Filesystem 43ed2bb9-5b51-4bdc-af8d-af2ca7001f3f
>
> Huh. Which test is this, specifically? And is this easily
> reproduceable and new? Or hard to re-trigger and who knows how long
> it's been this way?
>
The bug was recreated for the first time when using the next-20231222
kernel. IIRC, it was generic/475 which caused the bug at that time. The kernel
was accidently built without debug info and hence I couldn't do much to find
the root cause.
However, with the next-20240102 kernel, it was generic/388 test which
recreated the bug.
With both kernels, one iteration across the recoveryloop group of tests was
sufficient to recreate the bug. I am hoping that this stays true for my future
attempts.
>> [ 190.291326] XFS (loop5): Ending clean mount
>> [ 190.301165] XFS (loop5): User initiated shutdown received.
>> [ 190.302808] XFS (loop5): Log I/O Error (0x6) detected at
>> xfs_fs_goingdown+0x93/0xd0 [xfs] (fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c:458). Shutting
>> down filesystem.
>> [ 190.308555] XFS (loop5): Please unmount the filesystem and rectify the problem(s)
>> [ 190.369214] XFS (loop5): Unmounting Filesystem 43ed2bb9-5b51-4bdc-af8d-af2ca7001f3f
>> [ 190.404932] XFS (loop5): Mounting V5 Filesystem 43ed2bb9-5b51-4bdc-af8d-af2ca7001f3f
>> [ 190.419673] XFS (loop5): Ending clean mount
>> [ 190.429301] XFS (loop5): User initiated shutdown received.
>> [ 190.431178] XFS (loop5): Log I/O Error (0x6) detected at
>> xfs_fs_goingdown+0x93/0xd0 [xfs] (fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c:458). Shutting
>> down filesystem.
>> [ 190.437622] XFS (loop5): Please unmount the filesystem and rectify the problem(s)
>> [ 369.717531] INFO: task fsstress:18269 blocked for more than 122 seconds.
>> [ 369.724323] Not tainted 6.7.0-rc8-next-20240102+ #1
>> [ 369.727077] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
>> [ 369.730717] task:fsstress state:D stack:0 pid:18269 tgid:18269 ppid:1 flags:0x00004006
>> [ 369.734945] Call Trace:
>> [ 369.736468] <TASK>
>> [ 369.737768] __schedule+0x237/0x720
>> [ 369.739593] schedule+0x30/0xd0
>> [ 369.741310] schedule_preempt_disabled+0x15/0x30
>> [ 369.743555] rwsem_down_read_slowpath+0x240/0x4d0
>> [ 369.745634] ? xlog_cil_force_seq+0x200/0x270 [xfs]
>> [ 369.747859] down_read+0x49/0xa0
>> [ 369.749436] super_lock+0xf1/0x120
>> [ 369.751008] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
>> [ 369.753530] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
>> [ 369.755865] ? xfs_log_force+0x20c/0x230 [xfs]
>> [ 369.758147] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
>> [ 369.760391] ? __pfx_sync_fs_one_sb+0x10/0x10
>> [ 369.762516] iterate_supers+0x5a/0xe0
>> [ 369.764403] ksys_sync+0x64/0xb0
>> [ 369.766104] __do_sys_sync+0xe/0x20
>> [ 369.767856] do_syscall_64+0x6c/0x170
>> [ 369.769684] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6c/0x74
>> [ 369.771975] RIP: 0033:0x7f2b24e3ed5b
>> [ 369.773732] RSP: 002b:00007fff7183b058 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a2
>> [ 369.777022] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000007a120 RCX: 00007f2b24e3ed5b
>> [ 369.780177] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000796b9c69 RDI: 0000000000000000
>> [ 369.783356] RBP: 028f5c28f5c28f5c R08: 0000000000000008 R09: 0000000000001010
>> [ 369.787096] R10: 00007f2b24e15228 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000000
>> [ 369.790256] R13: 8f5c28f5c28f5c29 R14: 00000000004034c0 R15: 00007f2b250156c0
>> [ 369.793499] </TASK>
>>
>> The sb->s_umount semaphore was owned by a task executing systemd-coredump. The
>> systemd-coredump task was busy executing shrink_dcache_parent() as shown below,
>>
>> systemd-coredum 18274 [001] 85214.162988: probe:d_walk: (ffffffff88218580) parent_path="/" fs_type="tmpfs"
>> ffffffff88218581 d_walk+0x1 ([kernel.kallsyms])
>> ffffffff8821a8e2 shrink_dcache_parent+0x52 ([kernel.kallsyms])
>> ffffffff8821ac9b shrink_dcache_for_umount+0x3b ([kernel.kallsyms])
>> ffffffff881f9c10 generic_shutdown_super+0x20 ([kernel.kallsyms])
>> ffffffff881fa667 kill_litter_super+0x27 ([kernel.kallsyms])
>> ffffffff881fb3b5 deactivate_locked_super+0x35 ([kernel.kallsyms])
>> ffffffff88226d30 cleanup_mnt+0x100 ([kernel.kallsyms])
>> ffffffff87eef72c task_work_run+0x5c ([kernel.kallsyms])
>> ffffffff87ec9763 do_exit+0x2b3 ([kernel.kallsyms])
>> ffffffff87ec9b90 do_group_exit+0x30 ([kernel.kallsyms])
>> ffffffff87ec9c38 [unknown] ([kernel.kallsyms])
>> ffffffff88b9930c do_syscall_64+0x6c ([kernel.kallsyms])
>> ffffffff88c000e5 entry_SYSCALL_64+0xa5 ([kernel.kallsyms])
>
> Curious. I wonder if systemd-coredump@ is tearing down its private
> /tmp or something? I've never had systemd coredump installed on a test
> vm.
>
I have always used Oracle Linux 9 for my testing and hence systemd-coredump
has always been installed and enabled.
>> Trying to obtain more debug data via perf caused the 'perf record' task to
>> indefinitely enter into the TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE state. I will try to recreate
>> the bug and debug it further.
>
> Doh. :(
>
> --D
>>
>> The following is the fstests configuration that was used.
>> FSTYP=xfs
>> TEST_DEV=/dev/loop7
>> TEST_DIR=/media/test
>> SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/loop5
>> SCRATCH_MNT=/media/scratch
>> MKFS_OPTIONS='-f -m reflink=1,rmapbt=1, -i sparse=1,'
>> MOUNT_OPTIONS='-o usrquota,grpquota,prjquota'
>> LOGWRITES_DEV=/dev/loop6
>> SOAK_DURATION=9900
>>
>> The recoveryloop group of tests can then be executed by,
>> $ ./check -g recoveryloop
>>
--
Chandan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-04 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-03 6:42 [BUG REPORT] shrink_dcache_parent() loops indefinitely on a next-20240102 kernel Chandan Babu R
2024-01-04 4:34 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-01-04 13:10 ` Chandan Babu R [this message]
2024-01-18 5:29 ` Chandan Babu R
2024-01-18 6:39 ` Al Viro
2024-01-23 6:01 ` Chandan Babu R
2024-01-23 11:40 ` Al Viro
2024-01-25 6:31 ` Chandan Babu R
2024-02-03 13:05 ` Dominique Martinet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87sf3d8c0u.fsf@debian-BULLSEYE-live-builder-AMD64 \
--to=chandanbabu@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox