From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lsf-pc <lsf-pc@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] do we really need PG_error at all?
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 10:32:34 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87varvp5v1.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DC27F5BA-BCCA-41FF-8D41-7BB99AA4DB26@dilger.ca>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1230 bytes --]
On Mon, Feb 27 2017, Andreas Dilger wrote:
>
> My thought is that PG_error is definitely useful for applications to get
> correct errors back when doing write()/sync_file_range() so that they know
> there is an error in the data that _they_ wrote, rather than receiving an
> error for data that may have been written by another thread, and in turn
> clearing the error from another thread so it *doesn't* know it had a write
> error.
It might be useful in that way, but it is not currently used that way.
Such usage would be a change in visible behaviour.
sync_file_range() calls filemap_fdatawait_range(), which calls
filemap_check_errors().
If there have been any errors in the file recently, inside or outside
the range, the latter will return an error which will propagate up.
>
> As for stray sync() clearing PG_error from underneath an application, that
> shouldn't happen since filemap_fdatawait_keep_errors() doesn't clear errors
> and is used by device flushing code (fdatawait_one_bdev(), wait_sb_inodes()).
filemap_fdatawait_keep_errors() calls __filemap_fdatawait_range() which
clears PG_error on every page.
What it doesn't do is call filemap_check_errors(), and so doesn't clear
AS_ENOSPC or AS_EIO.
NeilBrown
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-27 23:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-26 14:42 [LSF/MM TOPIC] do we really need PG_error at all? Jeff Layton
2017-02-26 17:10 ` James Bottomley
2017-02-26 21:03 ` NeilBrown
2017-02-26 22:43 ` Jeff Layton
2017-02-26 23:30 ` James Bottomley
2017-02-26 23:57 ` Jeff Layton
2017-02-27 0:27 ` NeilBrown
2017-02-27 15:07 ` Jeff Layton
2017-02-27 22:51 ` Andreas Dilger
2017-02-27 23:02 ` Jeff Layton
2017-02-27 23:32 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2017-02-28 1:11 ` [Lsf-pc] " Jeff Layton
2017-02-28 10:12 ` Boaz Harrosh
2017-02-28 11:32 ` Jeff Layton
2017-02-28 20:45 ` NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87varvp5v1.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name \
--to=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=adilger@dilger.ca \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lsf-pc@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).