From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V7 00/26]  New ACL format for better NFSv4 acl interoperability
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:24:46 +0530
Message-ID: <87zkgx5xw9.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
References: <1318951981-5508-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4E9DA6B4.2010906@shealevy.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: agruen@kernel.org, bfields@fieldses.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, dhowells@redhat.com,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
To: Shea Levy <shea@shealevy.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <4E9DA6B4.2010906@shealevy.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:17:56 -0400, Shea Levy <shea@shealevy.com> wrote:
> On 10/18/11 11:32 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > More details regarding richacl can be found at
> > http://acl.bestbits.at/richacl/
> >
> FYI, this site says nfs4acls is the successor project of richacls, but 
> from what I can see it is actually the predecessor. Is my understanding 
> correct, or is nfs4acls the next-gen product here?
> 

You are correct. it is the predecessor.

-aneesh