From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: kaih@khms.westfalen.de (Kai Henningsen)
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Replacing iget4/read_inode2 with icreate
Date: 01 May 2002 18:17:00 +0200
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <8O3bGfeHw-B@khms.westfalen.de>
References: <20020501024236.GA1878@mentor.odyssey.cs.cmu.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <20020501024236.GA1878@mentor.odyssey.cs.cmu.edu>
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu (Jan Harkes)  wrote on 30.04.02 in <20020501024236.GA1878@mentor.odyssey.cs.cmu.edu>:

> +iget4() and the read_inode2 callback have been superceded by icreate()
> +which has the following prototype,
> +
> +    struct inode *icreate(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long ino,
> +			  void (*test)(struct inode *, void *),

Surely test doesn't return a void?!

MfG Kai