From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Martin Jambor <jamborm@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Simulated Ordered Mode
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 16:02:30 +0200
Message-ID: <8e70aacf0507310702ad09c99@mail.gmail.com>
References: <200507310839.LAA15595@raad.intranet>
Reply-To: Martin Jambor <jamborm@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.199]:32549 "EHLO zproxy.gmail.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263227AbVGaOCb convert rfc822-to-8bit
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 31 Jul 2005 10:02:31 -0400
Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id r28so671424nza
        for <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 07:02:30 -0700 (PDT)
To: Al Boldi <a1426z@gawab.com>
In-Reply-To: <200507310839.LAA15595@raad.intranet>
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On 7/31/05, Al Boldi <a1426z@gawab.com> wrote:
> Is it possible to instruct the FS to delay metadata update until after a
> filedata sync?

If you delayed any update until after a sync it wouldn't be a sync
anymore, would it?

HTH

Martin