linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Avi Kivity <avi@scylladb.com>,
	Sandeep Dhavale <dhavale@google.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] fs/aio: Restrict kiocb_set_cancel_fn() to I/O submitted via libaio
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 11:43:08 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <90c96981-cd7a-4a4c-aade-7a5cfc3fd617@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240304191047.GB1195@sol.localdomain>

On 3/4/24 11:10, Eric Biggers wrote:
> If I understand correctly, this patch is supposed to fix a memory safety bug
> when kiocb_set_cancel_fn() is called on a kiocb that is owned by io_uring
> instead of legacy AIO.  However, the kiocb still gets accessed as an aio_kiocb
> at the very beginning of the function, so it's still broken:
> 
> 	struct aio_kiocb *req = container_of(iocb, struct aio_kiocb, rw);
> 	struct kioctx *ctx = req->ki_ctx;

Hi Eric,

Thanks for having reported this. I agree that this needs to be fixed.

> I'm also wondering why "ignore" is the right fix.  The USB gadget driver sees
> that it has asynchronous I/O (kiocb::ki_complete != NULL) and then tries to set
> a cancellation function.  What is the expected behavior when the I/O is owned by
> io_uring?  Should it perhaps call into io_uring to set a cancellation function
> with io_uring?  Or is the concept of cancellation functions indeed specific to
> legacy AIO, and nothing should be done with io_uring I/O?

As far as I know no Linux user space interface for submitting I/O 
supports cancellation of read or write requests other than the AIO
io_cancel() system call.

It would make it easier to maintain the kernel if I/O cancellation
support would be removed. However, there is existing user space code
that depends on USB I/O cancellation so I'm not sure how to proceed to 
remove AIO io_cancel() support from the kernel.

Thanks,

Bart.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-04 19:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-15 20:47 [PATCH v4 0/2] Fix libaio cancellation support Bart Van Assche
2024-02-15 20:47 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] fs/aio: Restrict kiocb_set_cancel_fn() to I/O submitted via libaio Bart Van Assche
2024-02-21 14:26   ` Jens Axboe
2024-02-21 15:32   ` (subset) " Christian Brauner
2024-03-04 19:10   ` Eric Biggers
2024-03-04 19:43     ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2024-03-04 20:21       ` Jens Axboe
2024-03-05 20:43         ` Bart Van Assche
2024-03-05 21:55           ` Jens Axboe
2024-03-04 20:09     ` Jens Axboe
2024-03-04 20:49       ` Eric Biggers
2024-03-04 20:53         ` Jens Axboe
2024-02-15 20:47 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] fs/aio: Make io_cancel() generate completions again Bart Van Assche
2024-02-16  7:13   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-16 12:08     ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-16 17:11     ` Bart Van Assche
2024-02-27  8:55   ` (subset) " Christian Brauner
2024-02-21  9:26 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] Fix libaio cancellation support Christian Brauner
2024-02-21 17:39   ` Bart Van Assche
2024-02-26 20:50   ` Bart Van Assche
2024-02-27  8:55     ` Christian Brauner
2024-03-04 18:53 ` Eric Biggers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=90c96981-cd7a-4a4c-aade-7a5cfc3fd617@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=avi@scylladb.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=dhavale@google.com \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).