From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:35788 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751332AbeGJKFu (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jul 2018 06:05:50 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098393.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w6AA5FHS141042 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 06:05:49 -0400 Received: from e36.co.us.ibm.com (e36.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.154]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2k4ra9cedw-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 06:05:49 -0400 Received: from localhost by e36.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 04:05:48 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 15:41:21 +0530 From: vrbagal1 To: Nicholas Piggin Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, sachinp , linuxppc-dev , Linuxppc-dev Subject: Re: [powerpc/powervm]Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1] while running stress-ng In-Reply-To: <20180710180708.6e0cd26b@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com> References: <8595a4f915a7344210a8cc7ad6923a2b@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180710180708.6e0cd26b@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com> Message-Id: <920d9bc6a2c3449700dec191c271bdff@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 2018-07-10 13:37, Nicholas Piggin wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jul 2018 11:58:40 +0530 > vrbagal1 wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Observing kernel oops on Power9(ZZ) box, running on PowerVM, while >> running stress-ng. >> >> >> Kernel: 4.18.0-rc4 >> Machine: Power9 ZZ (PowerVM) >> Test: Stress-ng >> >> Attached is .config file >> >> Traces: >> >> [12251.245209] Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1] > > Can you post the lines above this? Otherwise we don't know what address > it tried to access (without decoding the instructions and > reconstructing > it from registers at least, which the XFS devs wouldn't be inclined to > do). > ah my bad. [12251.245179] Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address 0x6000000060000000 [12251.245199] Faulting instruction address: 0xc000000000319e2c > And I assume there is nothing else relevant to XFS in the dmesg before > this? Nothing relevant in dmesg Regards, Venkat. > > Thanks, > Nick