From: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>,
WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, miltonm@bga.com, aeb@cwi.nl
Subject: [PATCH] Restrict stack space reservation to rlimit
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:37:49 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9729.1265607469@neuling.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100208141716.FB55.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > > Why do we need page size independent stack size? It seems to have
> > > compatibility breaking risk.
> >
> > I don't think so. The current behaviour is clearly wrong, we dont need a
> > 16x larger stack just because you went from a 4kB to a 64kB base page
> > size. The user application stack usage is the same in both cases.
>
> I didn't discuss which behavior is better. Michael said he want to apply
> his patch to 2.6.32 & 2.6.33. stable tree never accept the breaking
> compatibility patch.
>
> Your answer doesn't explain why can't we wait it until next merge window.
>
> btw, personally, I like page size indepent stack size. but I'm not sure
> why making stack size independency is related to bug fix.
I tend to agree.
Below is just the bug fix to limit the reservation size based rlimit.
We still reserve different stack sizes based on the page size as
before (unless we hit rlimit of course).
Mikey
Restrict stack space reservation to rlimit
When reserving stack space for a new process, make sure we're not
attempting to allocate more than rlimit allows.
This fixes a bug cause by b6a2fea39318e43fee84fa7b0b90d68bed92d2ba
"mm: variable length argument support" and unmasked by
fc63cf237078c86214abcb2ee9926d8ad289da9b
"exec: setup_arg_pages() fails to return errors".
Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
---
fs/exec.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6-ozlabs/fs/exec.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-ozlabs.orig/fs/exec.c
+++ linux-2.6-ozlabs/fs/exec.c
@@ -627,10 +627,13 @@ int setup_arg_pages(struct linux_binprm
goto out_unlock;
}
+ stack_base = min(EXTRA_STACK_VM_PAGES * PAGE_SIZE,
+ current->signal->rlim[RLIMIT_STACK].rlim_cur -
+ PAGE_SIZE);
#ifdef CONFIG_STACK_GROWSUP
- stack_base = vma->vm_end + EXTRA_STACK_VM_PAGES * PAGE_SIZE;
+ stack_base = vma->vm_end + stack_base;
#else
- stack_base = vma->vm_start - EXTRA_STACK_VM_PAGES * PAGE_SIZE;
+ stack_base = vma->vm_start - stack_base;
#endif
ret = expand_stack(vma, stack_base);
if (ret)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-08 5:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <3984.1265416993@neuling.org>
[not found] ` <20100206042038.GB32246@kryten>
[not found] ` <10125.1265451732@neuling.org>
2010-02-08 0:07 ` [PATCH] Restrict stack space reservation to rlimit Michael Neuling
2010-02-08 0:28 ` Michael Neuling
2010-02-08 5:06 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-08 5:11 ` Anton Blanchard
2010-02-08 5:22 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-08 5:31 ` Anton Blanchard
2010-02-08 6:11 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-08 5:37 ` Michael Neuling [this message]
2010-02-08 6:05 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-08 7:07 ` Américo Wang
2010-02-08 7:11 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-09 6:11 ` [PATCH] Restrict initial stack space expansion " Michael Neuling
2010-02-09 6:46 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-09 8:59 ` Michael Neuling
2010-02-09 21:25 ` Andrew Morton
2010-02-09 21:51 ` Michael Neuling
2010-02-09 22:27 ` Helge Deller
2010-02-10 5:12 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-10 5:30 ` Michael Neuling
2010-02-10 5:31 ` Michael Neuling
2010-02-11 22:16 ` Helge Deller
2010-02-11 22:22 ` Michael Neuling
2010-02-08 10:45 ` [PATCH] Restrict stack space reservation " Michael Neuling
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9729.1265607469@neuling.org \
--to=mikey@neuling.org \
--cc=aeb@cwi.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=miltonm@bga.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).