From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, hch@infradead.org
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
nfsv4@linux-nfs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] CacheFiles: Use the ->write() file op rather than a special kernel aop
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 10:51:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9759.1238752316@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090403094138.9510.80681.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote:
> This reverts the patch:
>
> CacheFiles: Add a hook to write a single page of data to an inode
>
> Add an address space operation to write one single page of data to an
> inode at a page-aligned location (thus permitting the implementation to
> be highly optimised). The data source is a single page.
>
> This is used by CacheFiles to store the contents of netfs pages into
> their backing file pages.
>
> Supply a generic implementation for this that uses the write_begin()
> and write_end() address_space operations to bind a copy directly into
> the page cache.
>
> Hook the Ext2 and Ext3 operations to the generic implementation.
Actually, it doesn't. I split that out into the next patch, but I forgot to
edit the patch description.
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-03 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-03 9:41 [PATCH 1/4] CacheFiles: Use the ->write() file op rather than a special kernel aop David Howells
2009-04-03 9:41 ` [PATCH 2/4] CacheFiles: Revert the addition of write_one_page() David Howells
2009-04-03 13:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-04-03 13:53 ` David Howells
2009-04-04 5:55 ` Nick Piggin
2009-04-03 9:41 ` [PATCH 3/4] FS-Cache: Use a radix tree to track pages being written rather than a page flag David Howells
2009-04-03 9:41 ` [PATCH 4/4] FS-Cache: Revert the addition of PG_owner_priv2/PG_fscache_write David Howells
2009-04-03 9:51 ` David Howells [this message]
2009-04-03 13:49 ` [PATCH 1/4] CacheFiles: Use the ->write() file op rather than a special kernel aop Christoph Hellwig
2009-04-03 13:57 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9759.1238752316@redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nfsv4@linux-nfs.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).