From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Casey Schaufler Subject: Re: [AppArmor 39/45] AppArmor: Profile loading and manipulation, pathname matching Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:57:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <979511.88139.qm@web36601.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: Reply-To: casey@schaufler-ca.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: Pavel Machek , Crispin Cowan , Andreas Gruenbacher , Stephen Smalley , jjohansen@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: James Morris , Greg KH Return-path: Received: from web36601.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([209.191.85.18]:41533 "HELO web36601.mail.mud.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751164AbXFPC5S (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jun 2007 22:57:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org --- James Morris wrote: > On my system, it takes about 1.2 seconds to label a fully checked out > kernel source tree with ~23,000 files in this manner That's an eternity for that many files to be improperly labeled. If, and the "if" didn't originate with me, your policy is demonstrably correct (how do you do that?) for all domains you could claim that the action is safe, if not ideal. I can't say if an evaluation team would buy the "safe" argument. They've been known to balk before. Casey Schaufler casey@schaufler-ca.com