From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org,
hch@infradead.org, brauner@kernel.org, david@fromorbit.com,
jack@suse.cz, yi.zhang@huawei.com, chengzhihao1@huawei.com,
yukuai3@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] iomap: drop unnecessary state_lock when setting ifs uptodate bits
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 09:52:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <995196b3-3571-b23f-eb5f-d3fee5d97593@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZqprvNM5itMbanuH@casper.infradead.org>
On 2024/8/1 0:52, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 05:13:04PM +0800, Zhang Yi wrote:
>> Commit '1cea335d1db1 ("iomap: fix sub-page uptodate handling")' fix a
>> race issue when submitting multiple read bios for a page spans more than
>> one file system block by adding a spinlock(which names state_lock now)
>> to make the page uptodate synchronous. However, the race condition only
>> happened between the read I/O submitting and completeing threads, it's
>> sufficient to use page lock to protect other paths, e.g. buffered write
>> path. After large folio is supported, the spinlock could affect more
>> about the buffered write performance, so drop it could reduce some
>> unnecessary locking overhead.
>
> This patch doesn't work. If we get two read completions at the same
> time for blocks belonging to the same folio, they will both write to
> the uptodate array at the same time.
>
This patch just drop the state_lock in the buffered write path, doesn't
affect the read path, the uptodate setting in the read completion path
is still protected the state_lock, please see iomap_finish_folio_read().
So I think this patch doesn't affect the case you mentioned, or am I
missing something?
Thanks,
Yi.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-01 1:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-31 9:12 [PATCH 0/6] iomap: some minor non-critical fixes and improvements when block size < folio size Zhang Yi
2024-07-31 9:13 ` [PATCH 1/6] iomap: correct the range of a partial dirty clear Zhang Yi
2024-07-31 9:13 ` [PATCH 2/6] iomap: support invalidating partial folios Zhang Yi
2024-07-31 9:13 ` [PATCH 3/6] iomap: advance the ifs allocation if we have more than one blocks per folio Zhang Yi
2024-07-31 9:13 ` [PATCH 4/6] iomap: correct the dirty length in page mkwrite Zhang Yi
2024-07-31 9:13 ` [PATCH 5/6] iomap: drop unnecessary state_lock when setting ifs uptodate bits Zhang Yi
2024-07-31 16:52 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-08-01 1:52 ` Zhang Yi [this message]
2024-08-01 4:24 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-08-01 9:19 ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-02 0:05 ` Dave Chinner
2024-08-02 2:57 ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-02 6:29 ` Dave Chinner
2024-08-02 11:13 ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-05 12:42 ` Jan Kara
2024-08-05 14:00 ` Jan Kara
2024-08-05 15:48 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-08-07 11:39 ` Zhang Yi
2024-07-31 9:13 ` [PATCH 6/6] iomap: drop unnecessary state_lock when changing ifs dirty bits Zhang Yi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=995196b3-3571-b23f-eb5f-d3fee5d97593@huaweicloud.com \
--to=yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).