linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org,
	zohar@us.ibm.com, warthog9@kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org,
	kyle@mcmartin.ca, hpa@zytor.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	mingo@elte.hu, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] IMA: use rbtree instead of radix tree for inode information cache
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:22:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikoPoV=OYjzX9+Rd5tWERS+n8sFejJuot7++ONP@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101020220557.GN32255@dastard>

On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> wrote:
>
> /me wanders off to look at converting the xfs buffer cache rbtrees
> to RCU....

Look out for livelocks, though. And yes, they can happen.

So rather than a loop, one option is to do basically

  rcu_read_lock();
  seq = read_seqbegin();

  .. do lookup ..

  need_lock = read_seqretry(seq);
  rcu_read_unlock();

  if (need_lock) {
    get_real_lock();

    .. do lookup ..

    drop_real_lock();
 }

which just falls back to a locked access if the rcu model doesn't work.

                             Linus

  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-20 22:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-19 22:58 [PATCH 1/6] IMA: move read/write counters into struct inode Eric Paris
2010-10-19 22:58 ` [PATCH 2/6] IMA: drop the inode opencount since it isn't needed for operation Eric Paris
2010-10-19 22:58 ` [PATCH 3/6] IMA: use unsigned int instead of long for counters Eric Paris
2010-10-19 22:58 ` [PATCH 4/6] IMA: only allocate iint when needed Eric Paris
2010-10-20  3:53   ` Al Viro
2010-10-19 22:58 ` [PATCH 5/6] IMA: use rbtree instead of radix tree for inode information cache Eric Paris
2010-10-19 23:17   ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-20 11:31     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-20 22:05       ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-20 22:22         ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2010-10-20 22:47           ` Trond Myklebust
2010-10-21  0:58             ` Linus Torvalds
2010-10-21  2:17               ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-19 22:58 ` [PATCH 6/6] IMA: use i_writecount rather than a private counter Eric Paris
2010-10-20  0:25 ` [PATCH 1/6] IMA: move read/write counters into struct inode Linus Torvalds
2010-10-23  3:01   ` Eric Paris
2010-10-24  6:52     ` Mimi Zohar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='AANLkTikoPoV=OYjzX9+Rd5tWERS+n8sFejJuot7++ONP@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=kyle@mcmartin.ca \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=warthog9@kernel.org \
    --cc=zohar@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).